254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12397247)
1. Transmission of bone strain in the craniofacial bones of edentulous human skulls upon dental implant loading.
Yacoub N; Ismail YH; Mao JJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Aug; 88(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 12397247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
Ochiai KT; Ozawa S; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 12806328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis.
Bozkaya D; Muftu S; Muftu A
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 15583556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Keleş HG; Karaca Ç
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37083910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of abutment angulation on strains and stresses along the implant/bone interface: comparison between two experimental techniques.
Brosh T; Pilo R; Sudai D
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Mar; 79(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 9553888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant-to-bone force transmission: a pilot study for in vivo strain gauge measurement technique.
Cozzolino F; Apicella D; Wang G; Apicella A; Sorrentino R
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():173-181. PubMed ID: 30366308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K
J Dent; 2002 Jan; 30(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11741734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stress and displacement patterns in the craniofacial skeleton with rapid maxillary expansion: a finite element method study.
Gautam P; Valiathan A; Adhikari R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):5.e1-11. PubMed ID: 17628242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of resilient abutment components on measured strain using dynamic loading conditions.
Morton D; Stanford CM; Aquilino SA
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 9656177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress and strain patterns of 1-piece and 2-piece implant systems in bone: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ormianer Z; Ben Amar A; Duda M; Marku-Cohen S; Lewinstein I
Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 22223190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
