These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Biotechnology patents: strategies for meeting economic and ethical concerns. Gold ER Nat Genet; 2002 Apr; 30(4):359. PubMed ID: 11925560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The gene patenting controversy: a convergence of law, economic interests, and ethics. Kevles DJ; Berkowitz A Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 12645549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Equivalents in biotechnology patents. Auer HE Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 12610574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Protecting rights to early-stage technology. Shuster MJ; Su H; Blaug S Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):701-3. PubMed ID: 12776151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Australia experiments with 'experimental use' exemption. McBratney A; Nielsen K; McMillan F Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Aug; 22(8):1023-5. PubMed ID: 15286651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. European patents. Tough stance on stem cell, DNA claims. Vogel G Science; 2002 Aug; 297(5582):754-5. PubMed ID: 12161624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A modest proposal: toward improved access to biotechnology research tools by implementing a broad experimental use exception. Hoffman DC Cornell Law Rev; 2004 May; 89(4):993-1043. PubMed ID: 15174465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The scope of utility in the twenty-first century: new guidance for gene-related patents. Summers TM Georgetown Law J; 2003 Jan; 91(2):475-509. PubMed ID: 15046071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Opinions evolve on Kauffman patent. Dove A Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):373. PubMed ID: 10748506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable. Marshall E Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1374. PubMed ID: 19520926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patents. Signature on visitor's form fuels Stanford v. Roche court battle. Marshall E Science; 2011 Apr; 332(6026):163. PubMed ID: 21474725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]