These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12397356)

  • 1. Paternal inheritance of a female moth's mating preference.
    Iyengar VK; Reeve HK; Eisner T
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):830-2. PubMed ID: 12397356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Z linkage of female promiscuity genes in the moth Utetheisa ornatrix: support for the sexy-sperm hypothesis?
    Iyengar VK; Reeve HK
    Evolution; 2010 May; 64(5):1267-72. PubMed ID: 20002164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism.
    Albert AY; Otto SP
    Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5745):119-21. PubMed ID: 16210543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution: good males are bad females.
    Price TA; Hosken DJ
    Curr Biol; 2007 Mar; 17(5):R168-70. PubMed ID: 17339015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of sex ratio adjustment in the presence of sexually antagonistic selection.
    Blackburn GS; Albert AY; Otto SP
    Am Nat; 2010 Sep; 176(3):264-75. PubMed ID: 20653443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference.
    Laland KN
    Theor Popul Biol; 1994 Feb; 45(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 8023313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.
    Lewis Z; Wedell N; Hunt J
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2085-97. PubMed ID: 21729062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reinforcement of mate preference among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies.
    Kronforst MR; Young LG; Gilbert LE
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):278-85. PubMed ID: 17210020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual conflict via maternal-effect genes in ZW species.
    Miller PM; Gavrilets S; Rice WR
    Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):73. PubMed ID: 16601185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mating advantage of rare males in models of sexual selection.
    O'Donald P
    Nature; 1977 May; 267(5607):151-4. PubMed ID: 16073426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genic capture, sex linkage, and the heritability of fitness.
    Connallon T
    Am Nat; 2010 May; 175(5):564-76. PubMed ID: 20331359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Female soldier beetles display a flexible preference for selectively favored male phenotypes.
    McLain DK
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1085-95. PubMed ID: 16136806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits.
    Doebeli M
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1587-600. PubMed ID: 16313470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mating system and demographic constraints on the opportunity for sexual selection.
    Wiegmann DD; Nguyen T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Feb; 69(1):34-47. PubMed ID: 16257429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic independence of female signal form and male receiver design in the almond moth, Cadra cautella.
    Allison JD; Roff DA; Cardé RT
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1666-72. PubMed ID: 18681914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.