These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12398467)

  • 1. Detection of static and dynamic changes in interaural correlation.
    Boehnke SE; Hall SE; Marquardt T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1617-26. PubMed ID: 12398467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.
    Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Feb; 15(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 24258458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A binaural analog of gap detection.
    Akeroyd MA; Summerfield AQ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2807-20. PubMed ID: 10335632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of static and dynamically varying ITDs and IIDs to binaural detection.
    Breebaart J; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):979-92. PubMed ID: 10462803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological and psychophysical asymmetries in sensitivity to interaural correlation gaps and implications for binaural integration time.
    Lüddemann H; Kollmeier B; Riedel H
    Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 332():170-187. PubMed ID: 26526276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masking effects in binaural detection and interaural time discrimination.
    Koehnke J; Cohen MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):724-9. PubMed ID: 3584680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity to brief changes of interaural time and interaural intensity.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C; Akeroyd MA; Hartung K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1604-15. PubMed ID: 11325131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coding of temporally fluctuating interaural timing disparities in a binaural processing model based on phase differences.
    Dietz M; Ewert SD; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():234-45. PubMed ID: 17949695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binaural detection as a function of interaural correlation and bandwidth of masking noise: implications for estimates of spectral resolution.
    van der Heijden M; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Mar; 103(3):1609-14. PubMed ID: 9514025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaural correlation fails to account for detection in a classic binaural task: dynamic ITDs dominate N0Spi detection.
    van der Heijden M; Joris PX
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):113-31. PubMed ID: 19760461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detectability of tonal signals with changing interaural phase differences in noise.
    Grantham DW; Luethke LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1117-23. PubMed ID: 3356816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Similar Impacts of the Interaural Delay and Interaural Correlation on Binaural Gap Detection.
    Kong L; Xie Z; Lu L; Qu T; Wu X; Yan J; Li L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0126342. PubMed ID: 26125970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masked discrimination of interaural time delays with narrow-band signal.
    Ito Y; Colburn HS; Thompson CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Dec; 72(6):1821-6. PubMed ID: 7153429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking at high frequencies.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):306-16. PubMed ID: 1737879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The normalized interaural correlation: accounting for NoS pi thresholds obtained with Gaussian and "low-noise" masking noise.
    Bernstein LR; van de Par S; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):870-6. PubMed ID: 10462792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of randomizing values of interaural disparities on binaural detection and on discrimination of interaural correlation.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Aug; 102(2 Pt 1):1113-20. PubMed ID: 9265758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interaural correlation discrimination from diffuse field reference correlations.
    Walther A; Faller C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1496-502. PubMed ID: 23464020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interaural correlation discrimination: II. Relation to binaural unmasking.
    Durlach NI; Gabriel KJ; Colburn HS; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1548-57. PubMed ID: 3711454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Both frequency and interaural delay affect event-related potential responses to binaural gap.
    Huang Y; Kong L; Fan S; Wu X; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1673-8. PubMed ID: 18806687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The comparative effects of signal sensation level and sound-pressure level on interaural time discrimination.
    Cohen MF; Koehnke J; McClave AE; Pallanck PG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Sep; 78(3):908-15. PubMed ID: 4031261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.