These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12400125)

  • 1. [Initial information on adjustment of speech processor of the cochlear implant].
    Petrov SM
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2002; (4):18-20. PubMed ID: 12400125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Objective methods of fitting speech processors of cochlear implants Combi-40/40+ and Tempo+: impedance technique].
    Petrov SM; Shchukina AA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2007; (5):20-2. PubMed ID: 18163073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 15148189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The characteristics of hearing perception in light of the problem of rehabilitating patients who have undergone implantation].
    Lantsov AA; Petrov SM; Pudov VI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1998; (4):9-11. PubMed ID: 9752087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing cochlear implant users' speech performance with processor fittings based on conventionally determined T and C levels or on compound action potential thresholds and live-voice speech in a prospective balanced crossover study.
    Willeboer C; Smoorenburg GF
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 17086087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Acoustic perception in patients using a cochlear implant before and after adjustment sessions].
    Sharmanzhinova TD
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2003; (6):43-5. PubMed ID: 14671580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Contralateral electrically evoked reflex of the musculus stapedius in patients with cochlear implant].
    Potalova LA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2003; (6):38-40. PubMed ID: 14671578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personal, social, and family adjustment in school-aged children with a cochlear implant.
    Nicholas JG; Geers AE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):69S-81S. PubMed ID: 12612482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [On the modeling of acoustic perception in patients with implants].
    Lantsov AA; Petrov SM; Pudov VI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1999; (6):21-3. PubMed ID: 10596596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of cytomegalovirus (CMV) related deafness on pediatric cochlear implant outcomes.
    Lee DJ; Lustig L; Sampson M; Chinnici J; Niparko JK
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Dec; 133(6):900-5. PubMed ID: 16360511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partial deafness cochlear implantation in children.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Anderson I
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1407-13. PubMed ID: 17597232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.