BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12400168)

  • 21. Functional hearing loss in children.
    Yoshida M; Noguchi A; Uemura T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1989 Jul; 17(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 2767898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Correlation Between Click-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses and Future Behavioral Thresholds Determined Using Universal Newborn Hearing Screening.
    Cheng TY; Tsai CF; Luan CW
    Inquiry; 2021; 58():469580211049010. PubMed ID: 34644190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) to tone-pips: results in normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Hayes D; Jerger J
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(3):133-42. PubMed ID: 7178813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Paediatric auditory brainstem response and pure-tone audiometry: threshold comparisons. A study of 142 difficult-to-test children.
    Fjermedal O; Laukli E
    Scand Audiol; 1989; 18(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 2756331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison between thresholds obtained with pure-tone audiometry and the 40-Hz middle latency response.
    Kankkunen A; Rosenhall U
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 4023605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Audiogram construction using frequency-specific auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds.
    Frattali MA; Sataloff RT; Hirshout D; Sokolow C; Hills J; Spiegel JR
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1995 Oct; 74(10):691-4, 696, 698, passim. PubMed ID: 8529547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative interpretation of audiological test battery. I. A comparison with ABR in 97 cases of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Reimer A
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 3629170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Electric response audiometry in infants and preschool children. Long-term control of the results.
    Garrubba V; Grandori F; Lamoretti M; Nicolai P; Zanetti D; Antonelli AR
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 482():36-43; discussion 44. PubMed ID: 1897360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of rise-fall time and repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response to 0.5 and 1 kHz tone bursts using normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Beattie RC; Torre P
    Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 9080552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds in neonates and in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired pre-school children.
    Kankkunen A; Lidén G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 6463553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses.
    Picton TW; Durieux-Smith A; Champagne SC; Whittingham J; Moran LM; Giguère C; Beauregard Y
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Oct; 9(5):315-31. PubMed ID: 9806406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory brain stem response for objective measures of hearing.
    Sininger YS
    Ear Hear; 1993 Feb; 14(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8444334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the accuracy and reliability of application-based audiometry for hearing evaluation.
    Lee SY; Seo HW; Jung SM; Lee SH; Chung JH
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):7359. PubMed ID: 38548854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of predictive factors related to long-term hearing and temporal bone development in congenital microtia.
    Wang Y; Liu Y; Zhu J; Yang J; Wang D; Zhao S
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jan; 176():111838. PubMed ID: 38168652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predictive value of ABR in infants and children with moderate to profound hearing impairment.
    Kileny PR; Magathan MG
    Ear Hear; 1987 Aug; 8(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 3653534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Determining the pure tone frequencies to be used in identification audiometry.
    Katt D; Sprague H
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Nov; 46(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 7300270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In-situ Audiometry Compared to Conventional Audiometry for Hearing Aid Fitting.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Jasper BS; Kjærbøl EF; Jordell DH; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241259704. PubMed ID: 38835268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Recognition of unilateral auditory neuropathy in children].
    Li Y; Lin ZH; Wang XY; Yang Y; Zhang X; Zhou Y; Jin X; Zheng ZP; Shi JF; Wang XT; Bai J; Guo LN; Liu HH
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 May; 59(5):447-454. PubMed ID: 38811175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical application of brain-stem audiometry.
    Sørensen M; Christensen B; Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 3232024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application Progress of Objective Audiological Detection Techniques in Forensic Clinical Medicine.
    Fan F; Wu J; Deng ZH
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 39(4):360-366. PubMed ID: 37859474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.