195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12400909)
1. An evaluation of total and inhalable samplers for the collection of wood dust in three wood products industries.
Harper M; Muller BS
J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 12400909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determining particle size distributions in the inhalable size range for wood dust collected by air samplers.
Harper M; Muller BS; Bartolucci A
J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):642-7. PubMed ID: 12400908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a 25-mm disposable sampler relative to the inhalable aerosol convention.
Borsh FB; Sleeth DK; Handy RG; Pahler LF; Andrews R; Ashley K
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Sep; 16(9):634-642. PubMed ID: 31298629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Field comparison of two inhalable samplers used in Italy to measure the wood dust exposure.
Campopiano A; Basili F; Angelosanto F; Cannizzaro A; Olori A; Ramires D; Iannò A; Angelici L
Int J Occup Environ Health; 2016 Apr; 22(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 27373902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Site comparison of selected aerosol samplers in the wood industry.
Kauffer E; Wrobel R; Görner P; Rott C; Grzebyk M; Simon X; Witschger O
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 20044585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wood dust sampling: field evaluation of personal samplers when large particles are present.
Lee T; Harper M; Slaven JE; Lee K; Rando RJ; Maples EH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Mar; 55(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 21036895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The performance of personal inhalable dust samplers in wood-products industry facilities.
Tatum VL; Ray AE; Rovell-Rixx DC
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Jul; 16(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 11458924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intersampler field comparison of Respicon(R), IOM, and closed-face 25-mm personal aerosol samplers during primary production of aluminium.
Skaugset NP; Ellingsen DG; Notø H; Jordbekken L; Thomassen Y
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Oct; 57(8):1054-64. PubMed ID: 23792971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Field performance of the RespiCon for size-selective sampling of industrial wood processing dust.
Rando R; Poovey H; Mokadam D; Brisolara J; Glindmeyer H
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 15788383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A field comparison of inhalable and thoracic size selective sampling techniques.
Davies HW; Teschke K; Demers PA
Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):381-92. PubMed ID: 10518464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis of air filter samples from a scrap lead smelting operation.
Harper M; Hallmark TS; Andrew ME; Bird AJ
J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):819-26. PubMed ID: 15480496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A field evaluation of a single sampler for respirable and inhalable indium and dust measurements at an indium-tin oxide manufacturing facility.
Hawley Blackley B; Gibbs JL; Cummings KJ; Stefaniak AB; Park JY; Stanton M; Virji MA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Jan; 16(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 30325716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis for lead on air filters from different personal samplers used in a secondary lead smelter/solder manufacturer.
Harper M; Pacolay B
J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 16395471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance evaluation of disposable inhalable aerosol sampler at a copper electrorefinery.
Lee EG; Grimson PJ; Chisholm WP; Kashon ML; He X; L'Orange C; Volckens J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Mar; 16(3):250-257. PubMed ID: 30640589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Andrew ME
J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of particle transfer to sampler covers during the transportation of samples.
Erekaife G; Park HD; Kashon ML; Chisholm WP; Lee EG
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2021 Jul; 18(7):295-304. PubMed ID: 34129437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
