BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12401046)

  • 1. Effect of varying the force direction on maxillary orthopedic protraction.
    Keles A; Tokmak EC; Erverdi N; Nanda R
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):387-96. PubMed ID: 12401046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modified maxillary protraction headgear for the correction of class III skeletal malocclusion with anterior open bite.
    Qazi HS; Amjad AT
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Dec; 15(12):823-5. PubMed ID: 16398983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of a modified protraction headgear on maxilla.
    Alcan T; Keles A; Erverdi N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 10629517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sagittal airway dimensions following maxillary protraction: a pilot study.
    Sayinsu K; Isik F; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 16464873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Protraction--it's use and abuse].
    Hickham JH; Miethke RR
    Prakt Kieferorthop; 1991 May; 5(2):115-32. PubMed ID: 1815794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions of protraction and rapid palatal expansion in Class III malocclusion subjects.
    Kilinç AS; Arslan SG; Kama JD; Ozer T; Dari O
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 17906307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of face mask therapy with and without rapid maxillary expansion in adolescent patients.
    Yavuz I; Halicioğlu K; Ceylan I; Dağsuyu IM; Erdem A
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 22866596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficacy of maxillary protraction protocols with the micro-implant-assisted rapid palatal expander (MARPE) and the novel N2 mini-implant-a finite element study.
    Moon W; Wu KW; MacGinnis M; Sung J; Chu H; Youssef G; Machado A
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():16. PubMed ID: 26061987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of onplants as stable anchorage for facemask treatment: a case report.
    Hong H; Ngan P; Han G; Qi LG; Wei SH
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):453-60. PubMed ID: 15898388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a finite element study.
    Gautam P; Valiathan A; Adhikari R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 19524831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of protraction headgear on Class III malocclusion.
    Ngan P; Wei SH; Hagg U; Yiu CK; Merwin D; Stickel B
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Mar; 23(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 1641462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.
    Liu W; Zhou Y; Wang X; Liu D; Zhou S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Maxillary features following protraction headgear therapy in skeletal Class III patients].
    Viteporn S; Mathurasai W
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1990; 40(4):148-56. PubMed ID: 2074327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Vaughn GA; Mason B; Moon HB; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 16168327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy.
    Kurt G; Uysal T; Yagci A
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.