These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12401048)

  • 1. Bimaxillary morphometry of patients with class II division 1 malocclusion treated with twin block appliances.
    Singh GD; Hodge MR
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):402-9. PubMed ID: 12401048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Localization of mandibular changes in patients with class II division 1 malocclusions treated with twin-block appliances: finite element scaling analysis.
    Singh GD; Clark WJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 11298315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of early activator treatment in patients with class II malocclusion evaluated by thin-plate spline analysis.
    Lux CJ; Rübel J; Starke J; Conradt C; Stellzig PA; Komposch PG
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Apr; 71(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 11302588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
    Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of twin blocks and extraoral maxillary splint (Thurow) appliances for the correction of Class II relationships.
    Fernandes ÁF; Brunharo IH; Quintão CC; Costa MG; de Oliveira-Costa MR
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 20877731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Phan XL; Schneider BJ; Sadowsky C; BeGole EA
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 15132443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphospatial analysis of soft-tissue profile in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated using twin block appliances: geometric morphometrics.
    Singh GD
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 Feb; 5(1):38-50. PubMed ID: 12071373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.
    Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphometric analysis of the transverse dentoskeletal features of class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition.
    Alarashi M; Franchi L; Marinelli A; Defraia E
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 12607851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Space planning sensitivity and specificity: Royal London Space Planning and Korkhaus Analyses.
    Dause R; Cobourne M; McDonald F
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20575199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between bilateral condylar bone change and mandibular morphology: a study using morphometry.
    Alkhamrah B; Yamada K; Yamaki M; Ali IM; Hanada K
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 12353938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
    Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term occlusal and soft-tissue profile outcomes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with fixed appliances.
    McGuinness NJ; Burden DJ; Hunt OT; Johnston CD; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 21392692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.