BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12404826)

  • 1. Implanon. The new alternative.
    Cherry S
    Aust Fam Physician; 2002 Oct; 31(10):897-900. PubMed ID: 12404826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Etonogestrel implant (Implanon) for contraception.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2001 Aug; 39(8):57-9. PubMed ID: 11526801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Insertion and removal of Implanon: practical considerations.
    Mascarenhas L
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2000 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():29-34. PubMed ID: 11246605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical profile of Implanon: a single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implant.
    Croxatto HB
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2000 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():21-8. PubMed ID: 11246604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implantable contraception.
    Darney PD
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2000 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():2-11. PubMed ID: 11246603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Insertion problems, removal problems, and contraception failures with Implanon].
    Bensouda-Grimaldi L; Jonville-Béra AP; Beau-Salinas F; Llabres S; Autret-Leca E;
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Dec; 33(12):986-90. PubMed ID: 16321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impalpable Implanon: a case report.
    Stillwell S; Sheppard P; Searle S
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2003 Jul; 29(3):156-7. PubMed ID: 12885313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contraceptive implant.
    Hohmann H; Creinin MD
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 50(4):907-17. PubMed ID: 17982333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implanon users are less likely to be satisfied with their contraception after 6 months than IUD users.
    Wong RC; Bell RJ; Thunuguntla K; McNamee K; Vollenhoven B
    Contraception; 2009 Nov; 80(5):452-6. PubMed ID: 19835719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel.
    Funk S; Miller MM; Mishell DR; Archer DF; Poindexter A; Schmidt J; Zampaglione E;
    Contraception; 2005 May; 71(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 15854630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Etonogestrel implant as a contraceptive choice; patient acceptability and adverse effect profile in a general practice setting.
    Riney S; O'Shea B; Forde A
    Ir Med J; 2009 Jan; 102(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 19284015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insertion and removal of Implanon.
    Mascarenhas L
    Contraception; 1998 Dec; 58(6 Suppl):79S-83S. PubMed ID: 10095977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Implanon, a single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implant.
    Bennink HJ
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2000 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():12-20. PubMed ID: 11246602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant contraception.
    Meckstroth KR; Darney PD
    Semin Reprod Med; 2001 Dec; 19(4):339-54. PubMed ID: 11727176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tolerability and clinical safety of Implanon.
    Blumenthal PD; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Marintcheva-Petrova M
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2008 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():29-36. PubMed ID: 18330815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Implanon insertion and removal.
    Levine JP; Sinofsky FE; Christ MF;
    Contraception; 2008 Nov; 78(5):409-17. PubMed ID: 18929739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contraception failure and wrongful birth claims.
    Bird S
    Aust Fam Physician; 2002 Oct; 31(10):935-6. PubMed ID: 12404832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Australian women's experience with Implanon.
    Weisberg E; Fraser I
    Aust Fam Physician; 2005 Aug; 34(8):694-6. PubMed ID: 16113711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding.
    Ireland LD; Goyal V; Raker CA; Murray A; Allen RH
    Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 24973904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comments on Implanon review.
    O'Brien PA
    Br J Fam Plann; 2000 Apr; 26(2):117-8. PubMed ID: 10896466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.