BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12404974)

  • 1. Report of the mid-term review of Victoria's Maternity Services Program.
    Keleher H; Round R; Wilson G
    Aust Health Rev; 2002; 25(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 12404974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Staffing in postnatal units: is it adequate for the provision of quality care? Staff perspectives from a state-wide review of postnatal care in Victoria, Australia.
    Forster DA; McLachlan HL; Yelland J; Rayner J; Lumley J; Davey MA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jul; 6():83. PubMed ID: 16817974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The birth of a collaborative model: obstetricians, midwives, and family physicians.
    Pecci CC; Mottl-Santiago J; Culpepper L; Heffner L; McMahan T; Lee-Parritz A
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2012 Sep; 39(3):323-34. PubMed ID: 22963692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Having a baby in Victoria 1989-2000: continuity and change in the decade following the Victorian Ministerial Review of Birthing Services.
    Brown S; Darcy MA; Bruinsma F
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2002; 26(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 12141620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Essential components of successful collaborative maternity care models: the ACOG-ACNM project.
    Avery MD; Montgomery O; Brandl-Salutz E
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2012 Sep; 39(3):423-34. PubMed ID: 22963701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect on mortality of community-based maternity-care programme in rural Bangladesh.
    Fauveau V; Stewart K; Khan SA; Chakraborty J
    Lancet; 1991 Nov; 338(8776):1183-6. PubMed ID: 1682600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'No more strangers': Investigating the experiences of women, midwives and others during the establishment of a new model of maternity care for remote dwelling aboriginal women in northern Australia.
    Josif CM; Barclay L; Kruske S; Kildea S
    Midwifery; 2014 Mar; 30(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 23676699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Twenty-five years since the Shearman Report: How far have we come? Are we there yet?
    Catling CJ; Homer CS
    Women Birth; 2016 Feb; 29(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 26388214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How can maternity services be developed to effectively address maternal obesity? A qualitative study.
    Heslehurst N; Moore H; Rankin J; Ells LJ; Wilkinson JR; Summberbell CD
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):e170-7. PubMed ID: 20188447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Midwives at the heart of maternity care changes.
    Barlow G
    Aust Nurs J; 2008 Oct; 16(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 19013965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The business of maternity services.
    Dowling C
    RCM Midwives; 2005 Oct; 8(10):418-20. PubMed ID: 16250160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development of a quality model: measuring effective midwifery services (MEMS).
    Martin-Hirsch J; Wright G
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 1998; 11(2-3):50-7. PubMed ID: 10185316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic review comparing continuity of midwifery care with standard maternity services.
    Waldenström U; Turnbull D
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Nov; 105(11):1160-70. PubMed ID: 9853764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Collaboration in maternity care: possibilities and challenges.
    Waldman R; Kennedy HP; Kendig S
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2012 Sep; 39(3):435-44. PubMed ID: 22963702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications for nurse managers arising from immigrant women's experience of midwifery care in a hospital.
    Tebid R; Du Plessis D; Beukes S; van Niekerk V; Jooste K
    J Nurs Manag; 2011 Oct; 19(7):967-75. PubMed ID: 21988445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hospital accreditation: Driving best outcomes through continuity of midwifery care? A scoping review.
    Gamble J; Browne J; Creedy DK
    Women Birth; 2021 Mar; 34(2):113-121. PubMed ID: 32111556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Future directions for Victoria's public maternity services: is this "what women want"?
    Brown SJ; Bruinsma F
    Aust Health Rev; 2006 Feb; 30(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 16448378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign.
    Hartz DL; White J; Lainchbury KA; Gunn H; Jarman H; Welsh AW; Challis D; Tracy SK
    Aust Health Rev; 2012 May; 36(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 22624638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Where do low risk women live relative to maternity services across Victoria? Expanding access to public homebirth models across Victoria.
    Sharlov R; Taniar D; Phan T; Beare R; Srikanth V; Ma H; Farrell T; White C; Wallace EM; Davies-Tuck M
    Women Birth; 2022 Feb; 35(1):e91-e97. PubMed ID: 33451928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Models of maternity care in rural environments: barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives.
    Munro S; Kornelsen J; Grzybowski S
    Midwifery; 2013 Jun; 29(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 22863239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.