These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12405897)

  • 1. Improving doctors' letters.
    Tattersall MH; Butow PN; Brown JE; Thompson JF
    Med J Aust; 2002 Nov; 177(9):516-20. PubMed ID: 12405897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the letters we write: an exploration of doctor-doctor communication in cancer care.
    McConnell D; Butow PN; Tattersall MH
    Br J Cancer; 1999 May; 80(3-4):427-37. PubMed ID: 10408849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process in Latin America: a cross-sectional study on the use of clinical correspondence in public healthcare networks of six countries.
    Vargas I; Garcia-Subirats I; Mogollón-Pérez AS; Ferreira-de-Medeiros-Mendes M; Eguiguren P; Cisneros AI; Muruaga MC; Bertolotto F; Vázquez ML
    Health Policy Plan; 2018 May; 33(4):494-504. PubMed ID: 29452401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A quality assurance survey to improve communication between ENT specialists and general practitioners.
    Thong JF; Mok P; Loke D
    Singapore Med J; 2010 Oct; 51(10):796-9. PubMed ID: 21103815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-generated correspondence for patients attending an open-access chest pain clinic.
    Ray S; Archbold RA; Preston S; Ranjadayalan K; Suliman A; Timmis AD
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1998; 32(5):420-1. PubMed ID: 9819732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Training specialists to write appropriate reply letters to general practitioners about patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms; A cluster-randomized trial.
    Weiland A; Blankenstein AH; Willems MH; Van Saase JL; Van Daele PL; Van der Molen HT; Langbroek GB; Bootsma A; Vriens EM; Oberndorff-Klein Woolthuis A; Vernhout RM; Arends LR
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Oct; 98(10):1229-35. PubMed ID: 26206385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Letters from the radiation oncologist: do referring doctors give a damn?
    Graham PH; Wilson G
    Australas Radiol; 1998 Aug; 42(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 9727247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communication at the interface: do better referral letters produce better consultant replies?
    Grol R; Rooijackers-Lemmers N; van Kaathoven L; Wollersheim H; Mokkink H
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Mar; 53(488):217-9. PubMed ID: 14694699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oncology service correspondence: do we communicate?
    Babington S; Wynne C; Atkinson CH; Hickey BE; Abdelaal AS
    Australas Radiol; 2003 Mar; 47(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 12581054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The quality and relationship of referral and reply letters. The effect of introducing a pro forma letter.
    Couper ID; Henbest RJ
    S Afr Med J; 1996 Dec; 86(12):1540-2. PubMed ID: 8998223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Referral letters and replies from orthopaedic departments: opportunities missed.
    Jacobs LG; Pringle MA
    BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6750):470-3. PubMed ID: 2207400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review amongst restorative specialists on the quality of their communication with referring dental practitioners.
    Ricketts DN; Scott BJ; Ali A; Chadwick RG; Murray CA; Radford JR; Saunders WP
    Br Dent J; 2003 Oct; 195(7):389-93; discussion 383. PubMed ID: 14551631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Referral letters in oral medicine: standard versus non-standard letters.
    Navarro CM; Miranda IA; Onofre MA; Sposto MR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Oct; 31(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 12418571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Letters and notes in orthopaedic surgery.
    Hook SE; Banister GC; Topliss C; Webb J
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2006 May; 88(3):292-6. PubMed ID: 16786610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Valued Components of a Consultant Letter from Referring Physicians' Perspective: a Systematic Literature Synthesis.
    Rash AH; Sheldon R; Donald M; Eronmwon C; Kuriachan VP
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 33(6):948-954. PubMed ID: 29508258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Writing to referring doctors after a new patient consultation. What is wanted and what was contained in letters from one medical oncologist?
    Tattersall MH; Griffin A; Dunn SM; Monaghan H; Scatchard K; Butow PN
    Aust N Z J Med; 1995 Oct; 25(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 8588768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audit of consultant physicians' reply letters for referrals to clinics in a tertiary teaching hospital.
    Scott IA; Mitchell CA; Logan E
    Intern Med J; 2004; 34(1-2):31-7. PubMed ID: 14748911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of written reports provided by consultants in restorative dentistry to referring general dental practitioners in the west midlands.
    Saha S; Summerwill AJ
    Prim Dent Care; 2006 Apr; 13(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 16608600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study of communication between general practitioners and specialists.
    Westerman RF; Hull FM; Bezemer PD; Gort G
    Br J Gen Pract; 1990 Nov; 40(340):445-9. PubMed ID: 2271276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of referral letters on scheduling of hospital appointments: a randomised control trial.
    Jiwa M; Meng X; O'Shea C; Magin P; Dadich A; Pillai V
    Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Jul; 64(624):e419-25. PubMed ID: 24982494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.