These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12406618)

  • 21. Dosimetric characteristics of a MOSFET dosimeter for clinical electron beams.
    Manigandan D; Bharanidharan G; Aruna P; Devan K; Elangovan D; Patil V; Tamilarasan R; Vasanthan S; Ganesan S
    Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 19128995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
    Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of mammography radiation dose values obtained from direct incident air kerma measurements with values from measured X-ray spectral data.
    Assiamah M; Nam TL; Keddy RJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2005 Apr; 62(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 15701409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast dosimetry.
    Dance DR; Skinner CL; Carlsson GA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):185-203. PubMed ID: 10028637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the entrance surface air kerma in mammographic examinations in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    Oliveira LC; Dias TK; Lopes RT; Kodlulovich S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Feb; 133(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 19287013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Skin models and their impact on mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Massera RT; Tomal A
    Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():38-47. PubMed ID: 29673742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigation of mean glandular dose in diagnostic mammography in China.
    Du X; Wang J; Yang CY; Zhou XF; Chen W; Cao XJ; Zhou YY; Le Yu N
    Biomed Environ Sci; 2014 May; 27(5):396-9. PubMed ID: 24827723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
    Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A survey of clinical factors and patient dose in mammography.
    Kruger RL; Schueler BA
    Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1449-54. PubMed ID: 11488578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative study on skin dose measurement using MOSFET and TLD for pediatric patients with acute lymphatic leukemia.
    Al-Mohammed HI; Mahyoub FH; Moftah BA
    Med Sci Monit; 2010 Jul; 16(7):CR325-9. PubMed ID: 20581774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characterization of a fiber-optic-coupled radioluminescent detector for application in the mammography energy range.
    Benevides LA; Huston AL; Justus BL; Falkenstein P; Brateman LF; Hintenlang DE
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2220-7. PubMed ID: 17654923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
    O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct and pulsed current annealing of p-MOSFET based dosimeter: the "MOSkin".
    Alshaikh S; Carolan M; Petasecca M; Lerch M; Metcalfe P; Rosenfeld A
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Jun; 37(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 24648245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monte Carlo modeling of a high-sensitivity MOSFET dosimeter for low- and medium-energy photon sources.
    Wang B; Kim CH; Xua XG
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1003-8. PubMed ID: 15191284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experimental evaluation of a MOSFET dosimeter for proton dose measurements.
    Kohno R; Nishio T; Miyagishi T; Hirano E; Hotta K; Kawashima M; Ogino T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6077-86. PubMed ID: 17110771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of patient dose for mammography in Pernambuco, Brazil.
    Khoury HJ; Barros VS; Lopes C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):337-9. PubMed ID: 16381742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. X-ray spectroscopy applied to radiation shielding calculation in mammography.
    Künzel R; Levenhagen RS; Herdade SB; Terini RA; Costa PR
    Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3539-45. PubMed ID: 18777914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.