BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12407327)

  • 1. [Complications, sequellae and outcome of cervical conizations: evaluation of three surgical technics].
    Brun JL; Youbi A; Hocké C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 12407327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Consequences and treatment of cervical stenoses after laser conization or loop electrosurgical excision].
    Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Wertz JP; Cuénin C; Ritter J; Philippe E
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 9091546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
    Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy.
    Oyesanya OA; Amerasinghe C; Manning EA
    Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 8349168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization?
    Eduardo AM; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Schnadig VJ
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8913973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical conization: cold knife and laser excision in residency training.
    Delmore J; Horbelt DV; Kallail KJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 79(6):1016-9. PubMed ID: 1579298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating cervical neoplasia. LEEP as an alternative to cold knife conization.
    Simmons JR; Anderson L; Hernandez E; Heller PB
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1007-13. PubMed ID: 9883402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinicopathologic variables predictive of residual dysplasia after cervical conization.
    Schermerhorn TJ; Hodge J; Saltzman AK; Hackett TE; Sprance HE; Harrison TA
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Apr; 42(4):189-92. PubMed ID: 9131490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization.
    Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Ritter J; Meyer P; Philippe E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 88(6):933-8. PubMed ID: 8942830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk factors for cervical stenosis after loop electrocautery excision procedure.
    Suh-Burgmann EJ; Whall-Strojwas D; Chang Y; Hundley D; Goodman A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):657-60. PubMed ID: 11042296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of office loop electrosurgical conization and cold knife conization.
    Saidi MH; Setzler FD; Sadler RK; Farhart SA; Akright BD
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 Feb; 1(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 9050476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Conization with positive margins: what strategy should be adopted?].
    Bretelle F; Cravello L; Yang L; Benmoura D; Roger V; Blanc B
    Ann Chir; 2000 Jun; 125(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 10925486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
    Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in post-cone hysterectomy specimens.
    Phelps JY; Ward JA; Szigeti J; Bowland CH; Mayer AR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 84(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 8008307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Value of extemporaneous pathology sections in cone biopsies].
    Weyl B; Darazi N; Le Pors-Lemoine P; Forest E
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1996; 25(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 8926346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compliance after loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife cone biopsy.
    Greenspan DL; Faubion M; Coonrod DV; Hart KW; Mathieson K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):675-80. PubMed ID: 17766617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: an experience with 100 cases.
    Ostör AG; Duncan A; Quinn M; Rome R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 11063645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conization for cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ: long term follow-up of 1013 women.
    Larsson G
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1981; 70(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 7316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
    Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study.
    Duggan BD; Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Gebhardt JA; Groshen S; Morrow CP; Roman LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 180(2 Pt 1):276-82. PubMed ID: 9988787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.