These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12407475)
41. Data briefing. London's healthcare. National Association of Health Authorities and Trusts. Appleby J Health Serv J; 1994 Feb; 104(5389):36-7. PubMed ID: 10132868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Reasons for variation in coverage in the NHS cervical screening programme. McGahan CE; Blanks RG; Moss SM Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):354-66. PubMed ID: 11843937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey. Waller J; Bartoszek M; Marlow L; Wardle J J Med Screen; 2009; 16(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 20054095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cervical screening: alternative services. N Z Nurs J; 1987 Oct; 80(10):25-6. PubMed ID: 3453697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: the case of cervical screening in Britain. Sabates R; Feinstein L Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jun; 62(12):2998-3010. PubMed ID: 16403597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district. Beardow R; Oerton J; Victor C BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6691):98-100. PubMed ID: 2504348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. What future for cervical screening? Keene L N Z Nurs J; 1988 Mar; 81(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 3380476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Women's patterns of participation in mammography screening in Denmark. von Euler-Chelpin M; Olsen AH; Njor S; Vejborg I; Schwartz W; Lynge E Eur J Epidemiol; 2006; 21(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 16547835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Cervical cancer screening in Belgium. Arbyn M; Van Oyen H Eur J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 36(17):2191-7. PubMed ID: 11072203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effects of variations in hysterectomy status on population coverage by cervical screening. Beckmann K; Iosifidis P; Shorne L; Gilchrist S; Roder D Aust N Z J Public Health; 2003 Oct; 27(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 14651395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cervical screening and health inequality in England in the 1990s. Baker D; Middleton E J Epidemiol Community Health; 2003 Jun; 57(6):417-23. PubMed ID: 12775786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Interaction of spontaneous and organised screening for cervical cancer in Turin, Italy. Ronco G; Segnan N; Giordano L; Pilutti S; Senore C; Ponti A; Volante R Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1262-7. PubMed ID: 9301453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Cervical cancer screening in Greece. Riza E; Kyriakogianni-Psaropoulou P; Koumantakis E; Symiakaki H; Garas I; Linos A Eur J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 36(17):2227-32. PubMed ID: 11072209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. How district health authorities organise cervical screening. Elkind A; Eardley A; Thompson R; Smith A BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):915-8. PubMed ID: 2261539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A flaw in the system? Dickson N Nurs Times; 1991 Apr 24-30; 87(17):30-1. PubMed ID: 2023817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. "It's just part of being a woman": cervical screening, the body and femininity. Bush J Soc Sci Med; 2000 Feb; 50(3):429-44. PubMed ID: 10626766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. And now the failure of cervical screening. N Z Med J; 2001 May; 114(1132):221-2. PubMed ID: 11453354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Cervical screening - presentations to well women's clinic. Hristov S Aust Nurs Midwifery J; 2014 Jul; 22(1):43. PubMed ID: 25090889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The Gisborne Inquiry--what can we learn? Richardson A N Z Med J; 2001 May; 114(1132):236-8. PubMed ID: 11453362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]