These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12407688)

  • 1. An adaptive test of significance for a subset of regression coefficients.
    O'Gorman TW
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3527-42. PubMed ID: 12407688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An adaptive test for a subset of coefficients in a multivariate regression model.
    O'Gorman TW
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(5):849-59. PubMed ID: 17094348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
    Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of permutation and mixed-model regression methods for the analysis of simulated data in the context of a group-randomized trial.
    Murray DM; Hannan PJ; Pals SP; McCowen RG; Baker WL; Blitstein JL
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):375-88. PubMed ID: 16143991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Drop-outs and a random regression model.
    Overall JE
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Jul; 7(3):383-402. PubMed ID: 9252832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Key wavelengths screening using competitive adaptive reweighted sampling method for multivariate calibration.
    Li H; Liang Y; Xu Q; Cao D
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Aug; 648(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 19616692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bootstrap tests for overdispersion in a zero-inflated Poisson regression model.
    Jung BC; Jhun M; Lee JW
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):626-8; discussion 628-9. PubMed ID: 16011713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
    Hossain S; Gustafson P
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects: homogeneous regression slopes.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(5):477-96. PubMed ID: 8668873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power comparison of robust approximate and non-parametric tests for the analysis of cross-over trials.
    Correa JA; Bellavance F
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1185-96. PubMed ID: 11304735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression.
    Higgins JP; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1663-82. PubMed ID: 15160401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multivariate analysis of neuronal interactions in the generalized partial least squares framework: simulations and empirical studies.
    Lin FH; McIntosh AR; Agnew JA; Eden GF; Zeffiro TA; Belliveau JW
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):625-42. PubMed ID: 14568440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
    Chen X; Wei L
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A permutation test for inference in logistic regression with small- and moderate-sized data sets.
    Potter DM
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(5):693-708. PubMed ID: 15515134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical characterisation of bacterial wild-type MIC value distributions and the determination of epidemiological cut-off values.
    Turnidge J; Kahlmeter G; Kronvall G
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2006 May; 12(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 16643517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction discrepancies for the evaluation of nonlinear mixed-effects models.
    Mentré F; Escolano S
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2006 Jun; 33(3):345-67. PubMed ID: 16284919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating standard errors in feature network models.
    Frank LE; Heiser WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):1-28. PubMed ID: 17535577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Traditional and proposed tests of slope homogeneity for non-normal and heteroscedastic data.
    Moses TP; Klockars AJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):402-26. PubMed ID: 22053808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.