These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12408119)

  • 1. Conflicts of interest in immunisation.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2002 Feb; (175):19. PubMed ID: 12408119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parental autonomy and immunisation: a true choice?
    Johnston C
    Bull Med Ethics; 2002 Feb; (175):13-8. PubMed ID: 12408118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In no one's best interest.
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6978):1. PubMed ID: 14999243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MMR--responding to retraction.
    Wakefield AJ; Harvey P; Linnell J
    Lancet; 2004 Apr; 363(9417):1327-8; discussion 1328. PubMed ID: 15094289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomy of a scare.
    Begley S
    Newsweek; 2009 Mar; 153(9):42-7. PubMed ID: 19413010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Media attack prompts editorial backlash against MMR study.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6977):765. PubMed ID: 14985719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A statement by the editors of The Lancet.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):820-1. PubMed ID: 15022645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The right to choose.
    New Sci; 2001 Jan; 169(2273):3. PubMed ID: 12549466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Charismatic doctor at vortex of vaccine dispute: experts argue over findings, but specialist sees possible MMR link to autism.
    Frankel G
    Washington Post; 2004 Jun; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 15328608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MMR controversy raises questions about publication ethics.
    Fleck F
    Bull World Health Organ; 2004 Apr; 82(4):311-2. PubMed ID: 15296362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advising parents on MMR vaccine: acting on the evidence.
    Paediatr Nurs; 2001 Apr; 13(3):11. PubMed ID: 12025288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tough choices: would a separate measles vaccination be a disaster for Britain?
    Graham-Rowe D; MacKenzie D
    New Sci; 2002 Feb; 173(2330):12-3. PubMed ID: 12374168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Texas court dismisses defamation case brought by Andrew Wakefield against The BMJ.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g5998. PubMed ID: 25288504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A statement by The Royal Free and University College Medical School and The Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust.
    Hodgson H
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):824. PubMed ID: 15022651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assuring research integrity in the wake of Wakefield.
    Opel DJ; Diekema DS; Marcuse EK
    BMJ; 2011 Jan; 342():d2. PubMed ID: 21245120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Families prepare to sue law firm over handling of cases against MMR vaccine manufacturers.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d5867. PubMed ID: 21917838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What conflict of interest?
    Chew M
    Med J Aust; 2004 Jul; 181(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 15233601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public perception of immunisation.
    Salisbury DM; Yarwood J
    Lancet; 2004 Apr; 363(9417):1324. PubMed ID: 15094281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MMR immunisation. Health professionals should strongly recommend this immunisation.
    Elliman D; Bedford H
    BMJ; 2001 Oct; 323(7317):869. PubMed ID: 11683166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Don't shoot the messenger.
    New Sci; 2006 Jun 17-23; 190(2556):5. PubMed ID: 16862721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.