113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12408305)
1. The effect of set-up uncertainties, contour changes, and tissue inhomogeneities on target dose-volume histograms.
Cho BC; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ; Bartelink H
Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2305-18. PubMed ID: 12408305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using FDG-PET activity as a surrogate for tumor cell density and its effect on equivalent uniform dose calculation.
Zhou SM; Wong TZ; Marks LB
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2577-83. PubMed ID: 15487740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removing the effect of statistical uncertainty on dose-volume histograms from Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Jiang SB; Pawlicki T; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Aug; 45(8):2151-61. PubMed ID: 10958186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam.
Koelbl O; Krieger T; Haedinger U; Sauer O; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Dec; 180(12):783-8. PubMed ID: 15592698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of dose calculation uncertainty on the evaluation of radiotherapy plans.
Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Jeraj R; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 10757600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy: the radiobiological dose-per-fraction effect.
Song W; Battista J; Van Dyk J
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3034-45. PubMed ID: 15587657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of dose fractionation on respiratory motion induced IMRT delivery errors: a volumetric dose measurement study.
Duan J; Shen S; Fiveash JB; Popple RA; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1380-7. PubMed ID: 16752574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EUD-based margin selection in the presence of set-up uncertainties.
Song W; Dunscombe P
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 15125003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: the sensitivity of plan objectives and constraints to set-up uncertainty.
Ploquin N; Song W; Lau H; Dunscombe P
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3515-33. PubMed ID: 16030380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integration between in vivo dosimetry and image guided radiotherapy for lung tumors.
Piermattei A; Cilla S; Grimaldi L; Sabatino D; Fidanzio A; Greco F; Mameli A; Balducci M; Mattiucci GC; Frascino V; Stimato G; Gaudino D; Ramella S; Trodella L; D'Onofrio G; Zini G; Macchia G; Digesu' C; Morganti AG; Clemente S; Cozzolino M; Pedicini P; Fusco V
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2206-14. PubMed ID: 19610309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective monte carlo dose calculations with limited beam weight information.
Lindsay PE; El Naqa I; Hope AJ; Vicic M; Cui J; Bradley JD; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):334-46. PubMed ID: 17278519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The theoretical benefit of beam fringe compensation and field size reduction for iso-normal tissue complication probability dose escalation in radiotherapy of lung cancer.
Engelsman M; Remeijer P; van Herk M; Mijnheer B; Damen E
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1086-95. PubMed ID: 12852532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Equivalent uniform dose concept evaluated by theoretical dose volume histograms for thoracic irradiation.
Dumas JL; Lorchel F; Perrot Y; Aletti P; Noel A; Wolf D; Courvoisier P; Bosset JF
Phys Med; 2007 Mar; 23(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 17568539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric Impact of Delineation and Motion Uncertainties on the Heart and Substructures in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy.
Chin V; Finnegan RN; Chlap P; Holloway L; Thwaites DI; Otton J; Delaney GP; Vinod SK
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2024 Jul; 36(7):420-429. PubMed ID: 38649309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2705-17. PubMed ID: 12462739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic study of imaging uncertainties and their impact on 125I prostate brachytherapy dose evaluation.
Lindsay PE; Van Dyk J; Battista JJ
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1897-908. PubMed ID: 12906208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of dose calculation algorithms on the predicted dose distribution and NTCP values for NSCLC patients.
Nielsen TB; Wieslander E; Fogliata A; Nielsen M; Hansen O; Brink C
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2412-8. PubMed ID: 21776775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consequences of anatomic changes and respiratory motion on radiation dose distributions in conformal radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Britton KR; Starkschall G; Liu H; Chang JY; Bilton S; Ezhil M; John-Baptiste S; Kantor M; Cox JD; Komaki R; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jan; 73(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18929448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
