These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12408487)

  • 1. Bayesian analysis of overdispersed chromosome aberration data with the negative binomial model.
    Brame RS; Groer PG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 102(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 12408487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian methods for chromosome dosimetry following a criticality accident.
    Brame RS; Groer PG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 12862245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the accuracy of dose estimates from automatically scored dicentric chromosomes by accounting for chromosome number.
    Endesfelder D; Kulka U; Einbeck J; Oestreicher U
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2020 Dec; 96(12):1571-1584. PubMed ID: 33001765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zero-inflated regression models for radiation-induced chromosome aberration data: A comparative study.
    Oliveira M; Einbeck J; Higueras M; Ainsbury E; Puig P; Rothkamm K
    Biom J; 2016 Mar; 58(2):259-79. PubMed ID: 26461836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choice of model and uncertainties of the gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry in relation to the chromosome aberrations data in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
    Rühm W; Walsh L; Chomentowski M
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2003 Jul; 42(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 12844221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biophysical analysis of the dose-dependent overdispersion and the restricted linear energy transfer dependence expressed in dicentric chromosome data from alpha-irradiated human lymphocytes.
    Greinert R; Harder D
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 1997 Jun; 36(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 9271796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Approaches for dealing with various sources of overdispersion in modeling count data: Scale adjustment versus modeling.
    Payne EH; Hardin JW; Egede LE; Ramakrishnan V; Selassie A; Gebregziabher M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1802-1823. PubMed ID: 26031359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Application of detecting and taking overdispersion into account in Poisson regression model].
    Bouche G; Lepage B; Migeot V; Ingrand P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2009 Aug; 57(4):285-96. PubMed ID: 19540683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for overdispersion of lethal lesions in the linear quadratic model improves performance at both high and low radiation doses.
    Shuryak I; Cornforth MN
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2021; 97(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 32552223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of micronucleus assays and dicentric plus ring chromosomes for dose assessment in particular cases of partial-body exposure.
    Mendes ME; Mendonça JCG; Barquinero JF; Higueras M; Gonzalez JE; Andrade AMG; Silva LM; Nascimento AMS; Lima JCF; Silva JCG; Hwang S; Melo AMMA; Santos N; Lima FF
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2019 Aug; 95(8):1058-1071. PubMed ID: 31008687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uncertainty calculation methods in dose assessment for dicentric chromosome assay.
    González JE; Barquinero JF; Holladay BA; Di Giorgio M; Higueras M
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2020 May; 96(5):606-613. PubMed ID: 31986065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biological dosimetry of chernobyl cleanup workers: inclusion of data on age and smoking provides improved radiation dose estimates.
    Moore II DH; Tucker JD
    Radiat Res; 1999 Dec; 152(6):655-64. PubMed ID: 10581536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexible parametrization of variance functions for quantal response data derived from counts.
    Chen Y; Hanson T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):858-868. PubMed ID: 28296567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic analysis of fertility in dairy cattle using negative binomial mixed models.
    Tempelman RJ; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Aug; 82(8):1834-47. PubMed ID: 10480111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new regression model for overdispersed binomial data accounting for outliers and an excess of zeros.
    Ascari R; Migliorati S
    Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(17):3895-3914. PubMed ID: 33960503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical interpretation of the overdispersed distribution of radiation-induced dicentric chromosome aberrations at high LET.
    Virsik RP; Harder D
    Radiat Res; 1981 Jan; 85(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 7465770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On performance of parametric and distribution-free models for zero-inflated and over-dispersed count responses.
    Tang W; Lu N; Chen T; Wang W; Gunzler DD; Han Y; Tu XM
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(24):3235-45. PubMed ID: 26078035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalized concept of the LET-RBE relationship of radiation-induced chromosome aberration and cell death.
    Takatsuji T; Yoshikawa I; Sasaki MS
    J Radiat Res; 1999 Mar; 40(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 10408178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of hierarchical Bayesian models for overdispersed count data using DIC and Bayes' factors.
    Millar RB
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):962-9. PubMed ID: 19173704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NBLDA: negative binomial linear discriminant analysis for RNA-Seq data.
    Dong K; Zhao H; Tong T; Wan X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 17(1):369. PubMed ID: 27623864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.