303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12409825)
1. Comparison of Ranson, APACHE II and APACHE III scoring systems in acute pancreatitis.
Chatzicostas C; Roussomoustakaki M; Vlachonikolis IG; Notas G; Mouzas I; Samonakis D; Kouroumalis EA
Pancreas; 2002 Nov; 25(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 12409825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II and III scoring systems in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome.
Chatzicostas C; Roussomoustakaki M; Vardas E; Romanos J; Kouroumalis EA
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2003 Mar; 36(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 12590238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. APACHE system is better than Ranson system in the prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis.
Yeung YP; Lam BY; Yip AW
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2006 May; 5(2):294-9. PubMed ID: 16698595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic usefulness of scoring systems in critically ill patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
Williams M; Simms HH
Crit Care Med; 1999 May; 27(5):901-7. PubMed ID: 10362411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Value of four scoring systems for predicting prognosis of severe acute pancreatitis].
Fan JY; Huang ZW; Guo J
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2009 Jan; 7(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19134455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.
Cho JH; Kim TN; Chung HH; Kim KH
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Feb; 21(8):2387-94. PubMed ID: 25741146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Different Scoring Systems in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Observational Study.
Venkatesh NR; Vijayakumar C; Balasubramaniyan G; Chinnakkulam Kandhasamy S; Sundaramurthi S; G S S; Srinivasan K
Cureus; 2020 Feb; 12(2):e6943. PubMed ID: 32190494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the BISAP scoring system in prognostication of acute pancreatitis - A prospective observational study.
Hagjer S; Kumar N
Int J Surg; 2018 Jun; 54(Pt A):76-81. PubMed ID: 29684670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the BISAP scores for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients according to the latest Atlanta classification.
Zhang J; Shahbaz M; Fang R; Liang B; Gao C; Gao H; Ijaz M; Peng C; Wang B; Niu Z; Niu J
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2014 Sep; 21(9):689-694. PubMed ID: 24850587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of serum procalcitonin with Ranson, APACHE-II, Glasgow and Balthazar CT severity index scores in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis.
Woo SM; Noh MH; Kim BG; Hsing CT; Han JS; Ryu SH; Seo JM; Yoon HA; Jang JS; Choi SR; Cho JH
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jul; 58(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 21778801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Severity stratification and prognostic prediction of patients with acute pancreatitis at early phase: A retrospective study.
Zhou H; Mei X; He X; Lan T; Guo S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Apr; 98(16):e15275. PubMed ID: 31008971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The comparison of different clinical scoring systems for predicting prognosis in acute pancreatitis based on the revised Atlanta classification].
Wang AJ; Xu S; Hong JB; Liu P; Xia L; Zhu Y; He WH; Chen YX; Lü NH
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 52(8):668-71. PubMed ID: 24199883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Severity scoring for prognostication in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: comparative analysis of the Ranson score and the APACHE III score.
Eachempati SR; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
Arch Surg; 2002 Jun; 137(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 12049546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of modified Glasgow-Imrie, Ranson, and Apache II scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.
Chauhan R; Saxena N; Kapur N; Kardam D
Pol Przegl Chir; 2022 May; 95(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 36806163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis].
Surco Y; Huerta Mercado J; Pinto J; Piscoya A; De Los Ríos R; Prochazka R; Zegarra A; Cieza Zevallos J
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2012; 32(3):241-50. PubMed ID: 23128943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome.
Leung TK; Lee CM; Lin SY; Chen HC; Wang HJ; Shen LK; Chen YY
World J Gastroenterol; 2005 Oct; 11(38):6049-52. PubMed ID: 16273623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Is it useful to maintain specific scores for the early determination of the severity of acute pancreatitis?].
Anglade D; Létoublon C; Russier Y; Stasia MJ; Lachachi F; Desroche E; Arvieux C; Faucheron JL
Ann Chir; 2000 May; 125(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 10900733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of severity and survival in acute pancreatitis: validation of the efficacy of early warning scores.
Garcea G; Gouda M; Hebbes C; Ong SL; Neal CP; Dennison AR; Berry DP
Pancreas; 2008 Oct; 37(3):e54-61. PubMed ID: 18815539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis: comparison with other scoring systems in predicting severity and organ failure.
Park JY; Jeon TJ; Ha TH; Hwang JT; Sinn DH; Oh TH; Shin WC; Choi WC
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2013 Dec; 12(6):645-50. PubMed ID: 24322751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensive care management of acute pancreatitis: recognition of patients at high risk of developing severe or fatal complications.
Kaufmann P; Hofmann G; Smolle KH; Lueger A; Pieber T; Brunner G; Krejs GJ
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1996; 108(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 8677661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
