236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12409888)
21. Validation of the Omron 637IT wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor according to the International Protocol in the elderly.
Altunkan S; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 16534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation of three automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E), the Omron M2 Compact (HEM 7102-E), and the Omron R3-I Plus (HEM 6022-E).
Asmar R; Khabouth J; Topouchian J; El Feghali R; Mattar J
Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 20032779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validation of A&D UA-778 blood pressure monitor in children.
Narogan MV; Narogan MI; Syutkina EV
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):228-31. PubMed ID: 19938323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of the Microlife BP 3BTO-A oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol.
Cuckson AC; Reinders A; Shabeeh H; Shennan AH;
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 12488652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparative study of an ambulatory blood pressure measuring device and a wrist blood pressure monitor with a position sensor versus a mercury sphygmomanometer.
Altunkan S; Genç Y; Altunkan E
Eur J Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 18(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 17338963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Philips HP5332, and Nissei DS-175.
O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; Thomas M
Blood Press Monit; 1996 Feb; 1(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10226203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the Omron HEM-637 wrist monitor to the auscultation method with the wrist position sensor on or disabled.
Yarows SA
Am J Hypertens; 2004 Jan; 17(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 14700513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation of the Omron 637IT wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Oztaş K; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 16534409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inflationary oscillometric blood pressure monitoring: validation of the OMRON-MIT.
Golara M; Jones C; Randhawa M; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 12488653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the automated non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTRU) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population.
Mattu GS; Heran BS; Wright JM
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15021077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of a new wrist cuff oscillometric blood pressure device: comparisons with intraarterial and mercury manometer measurements.
Watson S; Wenzel RR; di Matteo C; Meier B; Lüscher TF
Am J Hypertens; 1998 Dec; 11(12):1469-74. PubMed ID: 9880129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparisons of auscultatory hybrid and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel validation studies.
Davis GK; Roberts LM; Mangos GJ; Brown MA
J Hypertens; 2015 Mar; 33(3):499-505; discussion 505-6. PubMed ID: 25380148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Calibrating Local Population-Based Blood Pressure Data from NYC HANES 2013-2014.
Kanchi R; Perlman S; Ostchega Y; Chamany S; Shimbo D; Chernov C; Thorpe LE
J Urban Health; 2019 Oct; 96(5):720-725. PubMed ID: 31486004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II.
Tasker F; de Greeff A; Liu B; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 19417636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of the Braun BP 3550 wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor and an EasyClick cuff according to the International Protocol in adults.
Ilman N; Altunkan S; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 17303987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of the OMRON M7 (HEM-780-E) blood pressure measuring device in a population requiring large cuff use according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
El Feghali RN; Topouchian JA; Pannier BM; El Assaad HA; Asmar RG;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 17496467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
