These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12410470)

  • 1. [II: Difference plots or scattergram--when to use which?].
    Krummenauer F
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Sep; 219(9):682-5. PubMed ID: 12410470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Graphic representation of data resulting from measurement comparison trials in cataract and refractive surgery.
    Krummenauer F; Storkebaum K; Dick HB
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003; 34(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 12757104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Statistical methods for comparison of two measuring procedures and for calibration: analysis of concordance, correlation and regression in the case of measuring intraocular pressure].
    Koch R; Spörl E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Jan; 224(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 17260320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [I: Box whisker plots--Flexible alternative to "MSE Plots"].
    Krummenauer F
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Aug; 219(8):613-5. PubMed ID: 12353181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [IV: Significance tests -- when to apply which one?].
    Krummenauer F
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Nov; 219(11):817-20. PubMed ID: 12494375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A practical approach to Bland-Altman plots and variation coefficients for log transformed variables.
    Euser AM; Dekker FW; le Cessie S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):978-82. PubMed ID: 18468854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlated measurement error--implications for nutritional epidemiology.
    Day NE; Wong MY; Bingham S; Khaw KT; Luben R; Michels KB; Welch A; Wareham NJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 33(6):1373-81. PubMed ID: 15333617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A standard curve based method for relative real time PCR data processing.
    Larionov A; Krause A; Miller W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():62. PubMed ID: 15780134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to use difference plots in quantitative method comparison studies.
    Twomey PJ
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2006 Mar; 43(Pt 2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16536914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radar plots: a useful way for presenting multivariate health care data.
    Saary MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 18313553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monocular versus binocular pupillometry.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Pfeiffer N; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2551-6. PubMed ID: 15617923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical strategies to assess reliability in ophthalmology.
    Patton N; Aslam T; Murray G
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Jul; 20(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 16327799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cohen's kappa or McNemar's test? A comparison of binary repeated measurements].
    Krummenauer F; Kalden P; Kreitner KF
    Rofo; 1999 Sep; 171(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 10520333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison.
    Bland JM; Altman DG
    Anesthesiology; 2012 Jan; 116(1):182-5. PubMed ID: 22129533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding data in clinical research: a simple graphical display for plotting data (up to four independent variables) after binary logistic regression analysis.
    Mesa JL
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 62(2):228-32. PubMed ID: 14962632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fiducial versus nonfiducial neuronavigation registration assessment and considerations of accuracy.
    Pfisterer WK; Papadopoulos S; Drumm DA; Smith K; Preul MC
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Mar; 62(3 Suppl 1):201-7; discussion 207-8. PubMed ID: 18424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study.
    Leung CK; Cheung CY; Weinreb RN; Qiu Q; Liu S; Li H; Xu G; Fan N; Huang L; Pang CP; Lam DS
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1257-63, 1263.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19464061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [V: p values: what they do tell and what they don't...].
    Krummenauer F
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Dec; 219(12):896-8. PubMed ID: 12548477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer as a self-tonometer.
    Naruse S; Mori K; Kinoshita S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 16101948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.