239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12411836)
1. 18FDG PET versus high-dose 67Ga scintigraphy for restaging and treatment follow-up of lymphoma patients.
Van Den Bossche B; Lambert B; De Winter F; Kolindou A; Dierckx RA; Noens L; Van De Wiele C
Nucl Med Commun; 2002 Nov; 23(11):1079-83. PubMed ID: 12411836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical impact of whole body FDG-PET on the staging and therapeutic decision making for malignant lymphoma.
Sasaki M; Kuwabara Y; Koga H; Nakagawa M; Chen T; Kaneko K; Hayashi K; Nakamura K; Masuda K
Ann Nucl Med; 2002 Jul; 16(5):337-45. PubMed ID: 12230093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 18FDG positron emission tomography versus 67Ga scintigraphy as prognostic test during chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Zijlstra JM; Hoekstra OS; Raijmakers PG; Comans EF; van der Hoeven JJ; Teule GJ; Jonkhoff AR; v Tinteren H; Lammertsma AA; Huijgens PC
Br J Haematol; 2003 Nov; 123(3):454-62. PubMed ID: 14617005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 18F-FDG PET is superior to 67Ga SPECT in the staging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Yamamoto F; Tsukamoto E; Nakada K; Takei T; Zhao S; Asaka M; Tamaki N
Ann Nucl Med; 2004 Sep; 18(6):519-26. PubMed ID: 15515753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and gallium-67 citrate scintigraphy for detecting malignant lymphoma.
Shen YY; Kao A; Yen RF
Oncol Rep; 2002; 9(2):321-5. PubMed ID: 11836600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and Ga-67 scintigraphy in evaluation of lymphoma.
Kostakoglu L; Leonard JP; Kuji I; Coleman M; Vallabhajosula S; Goldsmith SJ
Cancer; 2002 Feb; 94(4):879-88. PubMed ID: 11920454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical relevance of gallium-67 scintigraphy in lymphoma before and after therapy.
Delcambre C; Reman O; Henry-Amar M; Peny AM; Macro M; Cheze S; Génot JY; Tanguy A; Switsers O; Van HL; Couëtte JE; Leporrier M; Bardet S
Eur J Nucl Med; 2000 Feb; 27(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 10755723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gallium-67 scintigraphy in lymphoma: is there a benefit of image fusion with computed tomography?
Chajari M; Lacroix J; Peny AM; Chesnay E; Batalla A; Henry-Amar M; Delcambre C; Génot JY; Fruchard C; Bardet S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Mar; 29(3):380-7. PubMed ID: 12002715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of FDG-PET in malignant lymphoma.
Becherer A; Jaeger U; Szabo M; Kletter K
Q J Nucl Med; 2003 Mar; 47(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 12714950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, gallium-67 scintigraphy, and conventional staging for Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Wirth A; Seymour JF; Hicks RJ; Ware R; Fisher R; Prince M; MacManus MP; Ryan G; Januszewicz H; Wolf M
Am J Med; 2002 Mar; 112(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 11893364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of whole-body 18F-FDP-PET for restaging malignant lymphoma.
Mikosch P; Gallowitsch HJ; Zinke-Cerwenka W; Heinisch M; Pipam W; Eibl M; Kresnik E; Unterweger O; Linkesch W; Lind P
Acta Med Austriaca; 2003; 30(2):41-7. PubMed ID: 12752087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) and a comparison of (18)F-FDG-pet with (67)gallium scintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphoma: relation to histologic subtypes based on the World Health Organization classification.
Tsukamoto N; Kojima M; Hasegawa M; Oriuchi N; Matsushima T; Yokohama A; Saitoh T; Handa H; Endo K; Murakami H
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(3):652-9. PubMed ID: 17582800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging of malignant lymphomas with F-18 FDG coincidence detection positron emission tomography.
Hwang K; Park CH; Kim HC; Kim H; Yoon S; Pai M; Kim S
Clin Nucl Med; 2000 Oct; 25(10):789-95. PubMed ID: 11043718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [SPECT-CT 67Ga studies in lymphoma disease. Contribution to staging and follow-up].
Fuertes Manuel J; Estorch Cabrera M; Camacho Martí V; Flotats Giralt A; Rodríguez-Revuelto AA; Hernández Fructuoso MA; Carrió Gasset I
Rev Esp Med Nucl; 2006; 25(4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16827987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography versus
Gómez León N; Vega G; Rodríguez-Vigil Junco B; Suevos Ballesteros C
Med Clin (Barc); 2018 Oct; 151(7):255-264. PubMed ID: 29705152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of high-risk melanoma: comparison of [18F]FDG PET and high-dose 67Ga SPET.
Kalff V; Hicks RJ; Ware RE; Greer B; Binns DS; Hogg A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Apr; 29(4):506-15. PubMed ID: 11914889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whole-body FDG-PET imaging for staging of Hodgkin's disease and lymphoma.
Hoh CK; Glaspy J; Rosen P; Dahlbom M; Lee SJ; Kunkel L; Hawkin RA; Maddahi J; Phelps ME
J Nucl Med; 1997 Mar; 38(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 9074514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical value of FDG PET using coincident gamma cameras in staging and restaging of malignant lymphoma--compared with convenitonal diagnostic methods].
Pichler R; Maschek W; Hatzl-Griesenhofer M; Huber H; Wimmer G; Wahl G; Fridrik M
Nuklearmedizin; 2000 Sep; 39(6):166-73. PubMed ID: 11057408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance of positron emission tomography using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients treated for malignant lymphoma.
Cremerius U; Fabry U; Neuerburg J; Zimny M; Bares R; Osieka R; Büll U
Nuklearmedizin; 2001 Feb; 40(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 11373935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
