These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12411928)
1. Big bucks for autism research. Dove A Nat Med; 2002 Nov; 8(11):1190. PubMed ID: 12411928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomedical policy. New autism law focuses on patients, environment. Stokstad E Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5808):27. PubMed ID: 17204615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. National Institutes of Health Center Grants. Final rule. National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services Fed Regist; 2003 Dec; 68(240):69619-22. PubMed ID: 14674396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Betting big on an AIDS vaccine. Nat Med; 2005 Jun; 11(6):579. PubMed ID: 15937450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Big money, little science? Nat Immunol; 2008 Nov; 9(11):1199. PubMed ID: 18936775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Autism Speaks: the United States pays up. Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7154):628-9. PubMed ID: 17687286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomedical research. Rejecting 'big science' tag, Collins sets five themes for NIH. Kaiser J Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):927. PubMed ID: 19696320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Big bang theory: more reason to scrap Bush's stem cell policy. Cohen CB Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 19195105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research funding. Are epigeneticists ready for big science? Pennisi E Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5867):1177. PubMed ID: 18309057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Science policy. A budget with big winners and losers. Kintisch E; Mervis J Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5762):762-4. PubMed ID: 16469890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Editorial: "Indentured servants" of U.S. Government. Surg Neurol; 1974 Mar; 2(2):136. PubMed ID: 4818638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. National Institutes of Health implements electronic grant submission. J Investig Med; 2007 Jan; 55(1):9. PubMed ID: 17443943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Big payoffs possible for small-molecule screening. Toney JH Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5898):46. PubMed ID: 18832630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US draws up plans to tackle autism. Singer E Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6965):373. PubMed ID: 14647347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants. Kaiser J Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. research spending. Scientists feel the pain as 2007 budget outlook grows dark. Mervis J Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1666-7. PubMed ID: 17170258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. budget. Budgets in brief. Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1275. PubMed ID: 19264989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Without more federal support, success of U.S. stem cell research questioned. Schmidt C J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Feb; 97(3):164-5. PubMed ID: 15687355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. U.S. science funding. Research catches a break in catch-all spending bill. Mervis J; Lawler A; Kaiser J Science; 2003 Dec; 302(5651):1636-7. PubMed ID: 14657461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]