257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12412895)
1. The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks.
Pexman PM; Lupker SJ; Hino Y
Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Sep; 9(3):542-9. PubMed ID: 12412895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?
Pexman PM; Lupker SJ
Can J Exp Psychol; 1999 Dec; 53(4):323-34. PubMed ID: 10646204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Number-of-features effects and semantic processing.
Pexman PM; Holyk GG; Monfils MH
Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):842-55. PubMed ID: 14651293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phonological effects in visual word recognition: investigating the impact of feedback activation.
Pexman PM; Lupker SJ; Reggin LD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):572-84. PubMed ID: 12018509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perception is a two-way junction: feedback semantics in word recognition.
Pecher D
Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):545-51. PubMed ID: 11700906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
Alija M; Cuetos F
Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual phonology: the effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks.
Ziegler JC; Ferrand L; Montant M
Mem Cognit; 2004 Jul; 32(5):732-41. PubMed ID: 15552350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthographic, Phonological, and Semantic Dynamics During Visual Word Recognition in Deaf Versus Hearing Adults.
Peleg O; Ben-Hur G; Segal O
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2334-2344. PubMed ID: 32603647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on word recognition.
Marelli M; Amenta S; Crepaldi D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 25269473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
Mathey S
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.
Robert C; Rico Duarte L
J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 25680348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing.
Rice CA; Tokowicz N; Fraundorf SH; Liburd TL
Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1297-1313. PubMed ID: 31001796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From sound to meaning: Phonology-to-Semantics mapping in visual word recognition.
Amenta S; Marelli M; Sulpizio S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):887-893. PubMed ID: 27572870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modulation of brain regions involved in word recognition by homophonous stimuli: an fMRI study.
Newman RL; Joanisse MF
Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():250-64. PubMed ID: 20888806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is There an Orthographic Boost for Ambiguous Words During Their Processing?
Haro J; Comesaña M; Ferré P
J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):519-534. PubMed ID: 30478738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Orthographic influences in spoken word recognition: the consistency effect in semantic and gender categorization tasks.
Peereman R; Dufour S; Burt JS
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 19293108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Listening while reading promotes word learning from stories.
Valentini A; Ricketts J; Pye RE; Houston-Price C
J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Mar; 167():10-31. PubMed ID: 29154028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: evidence from multiple tasks.
Yates M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1385-1397. PubMed ID: 16393053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of neighborhood size and exposure duration on visual-word recognition: evidence with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision tasks.
Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 12713243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
