These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12412895)

  • 41. Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology.
    Gonnerman LM; Seidenberg MS; Andersen ES
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 May; 136(2):323-45. PubMed ID: 17500654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Vowel duration affects visual word identification: evidence that the mediating phonology is phonetically informed.
    Lukatela G; Eaton T; Sabadini L; Turvey MT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):151-62. PubMed ID: 14769074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Phonological processing dynamics in bilingual word naming.
    Friesen DC; Jared D; Haigh CA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Sep; 68(3):179-93. PubMed ID: 25383476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition.
    Grainger J; Muneaux M; Farioli F; Ziegler JC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):981-98. PubMed ID: 16194944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Phonological assimilation and visual word recognition.
    Lee Y; Moreno MA; Park H; Carello C; Turvey MT
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2006 Nov; 35(6):513-30. PubMed ID: 17103326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones.
    Yates M; Locker L; Simpson GB
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):856-66. PubMed ID: 14651294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Word regularity affects orthographic learning.
    Wang HC; Castles A; Nickels L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(5):856-64. PubMed ID: 22519676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification.
    Yap MJ; Tan SE; Pexman PM; Hargreaves IS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Aug; 18(4):742-50. PubMed ID: 21494916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies.
    Katz L; Feldman LB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1983 Jan; 9(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 6220113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print.
    Pexman PM; Hino Y; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1252-70. PubMed ID: 15521802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evidence for a limited-cascading account of written word naming.
    Bonin P; Roux S; Barry C; Canell L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1741-58. PubMed ID: 22612168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Word length and lexical activation: longer is better.
    Pitt MA; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1120-35. PubMed ID: 17002526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Dissociative effects of stimulus quality on semantic and morphological contexts in visual word recognition.
    Brown M; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2006 Sep; 60(3):190-9. PubMed ID: 17076434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition.
    Cortese MJ; Schock J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):946-72. PubMed ID: 23030642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of Chinese characters: A megastudy analysis.
    Sze WP; Yap MJ; Rickard Liow SJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1541-70. PubMed ID: 25622522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition?
    Perea M; Gil-López C; Beléndez V; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1631-47. PubMed ID: 26340587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The role of orthographic neighborhood size effects in Chinese word recognition.
    Li MF; Lin WC; Chou TL; Yang FL; Wu JT
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Jun; 44(3):219-36. PubMed ID: 25451553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming.
    Lacruz I; Folk J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1261-84. PubMed ID: 15513246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
    Hoffman P; Woollams AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they?
    Monsell S; Doyle MC; Haggard PN
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Mar; 118(1):43-71. PubMed ID: 2522506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.