These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12412963)

  • 21. Dental amalgam--what are the alternatives?
    Tyas MJ
    Int Dent J; 1994 Aug; 44(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 7822054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations.
    Browning WD; Dennison JB
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8957906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Achieving form and function for Class II restorations using aesthetic resin stratification.
    Shannon AT
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 18(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 16903545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO; Gallo JR; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of dental amalgam in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB; Roberts HW
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 12412958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Eliminating microleakage from the composite resin system.
    Estafan D; Agosta C
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(6):506-9. PubMed ID: 15055646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effectiveness of preventive resin restorations in pediatric patients.
    Walker J; Floyd K; Jakobsen J; Pinkham JR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):338-40. PubMed ID: 8958345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: considerations on finishing/polishing. Clinical procedures.
    Ferreira Rde S; Lopes GC; Baratieri LN
    Quintessence Int; 2004 May; 35(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 15130074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
    Qin M; Liu H
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tooth-conservative coronal restorations. Modern restorative concepts.
    Beggs R
    Dent Today; 2003 Jun; 22(6):84-7. PubMed ID: 12847847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of cooled composite inserts in the sealing ability of resin composite restorations placed at intraoral temperatures: an in vitro study.
    de la Torre-Moreno FJ; Rosales-Leal JI; Bravo M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 12760702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S; van Noort R
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A clinical review of preventive resin restorations.
    Walker JD; Jensen ME; Pinkham JR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(4):257-9. PubMed ID: 2197305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.