BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12413229)

  • 1. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different materials.
    Reis A; Kraul A; Francci C; de Assis TG; Crivelli DD; Oda M; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):621-7. PubMed ID: 12413229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
    Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
    J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques.
    Reis A; Francci C; Loguercio AD; Carrilho MR; Rodriques Filho LE
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 11357572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of fractured or sectioned fragments on the fracture strength of different reattachment techniques.
    Loguercio AD; Mengarda J; Amaral R; Kraul A; Reis A
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 15195730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials.
    Pusman E; Cehreli ZC; Altay N; Unver B; Saracbasi O; Ozgun G
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Feb; 26(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 20089057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction.
    Stellini E; Stomaci D; Stomaci M; Petrone N; Favero L
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Jun; 24(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 18489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength.
    Bruschi-Alonso RC; Alonso RC; Correr GM; Alves MC; Lewgoy HR; Sinhoreti MA; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Aug; 26(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 20662884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental fracture fragment attachment: fracture model and luting agent comparisons.
    Dean JA; Bullard G; Long RW; Moore BK; McDonald SM
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2004; 83(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 15266732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of various materials and tooth preparation designs used for reattachment of fractured incisors.
    Bhargava M; Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Oct; 26(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 20831637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Class IV preparations for fractured anterior teeth restored with composite resin restorations.
    Eid H; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 12739678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
    Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture strength of fragment-bonded teeth. Effect of calcium hydroxide lining before bonding.
    Farik B; Munksgaard EC; Andreasen JO
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11764835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shear bond strength of restorations applied to un-complicated crown fractures: an in vitro study.
    Pamir T; Eden E; Sebahtin Ahmed S
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Apr; 28(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 22051058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of composite resin restorations and porcelain veneers in relation to residual tooth structure in fractured incisors.
    Batalocco G; Lee H; Ercoli C; Feng C; Malmstrom H
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Feb; 28(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21752192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of reattached incisal fragments using different materials and techniques.
    Chazine M; Sedda M; Ounsi HF; Paragliola R; Ferrari M; Grandini S
    Dent Traumatol; 2011 Feb; 27(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 21244624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fatigue strength of fragmented incisal edges restored with a fiber reinforced restorative material.
    Garoushi SK; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 17277822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
    Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.