222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12413229)
21. Reattachment of rehydrated dental fragment using two techniques.
Capp CI; Roda MI; Tamaki R; Castanho GM; Camargo MA; de Cara AA
Dent Traumatol; 2009 Feb; 25(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 19208019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
Sagsen B; Aslan B
Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems using new-generation adhesives.
Kivanç BH; Görgül G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):33-40. PubMed ID: 18997914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Yildirim C
Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fracture resistance of reattached incisor fragments with mini fibre-reinforced composite anchors.
Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Wolke JG; Fokkinga WA; Machado C; Creugers NH
J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 19339099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer.
Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro fracture resistance of teeth with dentin-bonded ceramic crowns and core build-ups.
Lang M; McHugh S; Burke FJ
Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():88A-96A. PubMed ID: 14674507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Load fatigue of teeth with different ferrule lengths, restored with fiber posts, composite resin cores, and all-ceramic crowns.
Ma PS; Nicholls JI; Junge T; Phillips KM
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 19782825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fracture resistance of crowned incisors with different post systems and luting agents.
Gu XH; Kern M
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 17168934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Direct composite resin restoration of an anterior tooth: effect of fiber-reinforced composite substructure.
Garoushi SK; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Jun; 15(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 17645066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Microleakage and fracture patterns of teeth restored with different posts under dynamic loading.
Jung SH; Min KS; Chang HS; Park SD; Kwon SN; Bae JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 17936126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
