These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12414021)

  • 1. The impact of mental health advance directives on patient perceptions of coercion in civil commitment and treatment decisions.
    La Fond JQ; Srebnik D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2002; 25(6):537-55. PubMed ID: 12414021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conditions for psychiatric patients--a report: recommendations.
    Danish Council of Ethics
    J Int Bioethique; 2002 Mar; 13(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 15038372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the role of procedural justice in civil commitment?
    McKenna BG; Simpson AI; Coverdale JH
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2000 Aug; 34(4):671-6. PubMed ID: 10954400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advance directives in a correctional setting.
    Thomas DL; Watson JM
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):878-99. PubMed ID: 12455557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mental health advance directives: having one's say?
    Dunlap JA
    KY Law J; 2000; 89(2):327-86. PubMed ID: 12737165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract.
    Dresser RS
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1982; 16(3):777-854. PubMed ID: 11659391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Danish Mental Health Act of 1989: psychiatric discretion and the new legalism.
    Vestergaard J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(2):191-210. PubMed ID: 7914184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Law & psychiatry: psychiatric advance directives and the treatment of committed patients.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2004 Jul; 55(7):751-2, 763. PubMed ID: 15232012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Commentary: In search of common ground.
    Dvoskin JA; Spiers EM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 12875496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cautious advance on the right to treatment.
    Appelbaum PS
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Nov; 33(11):895-6. PubMed ID: 7141423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advance directive instruments for those with mental illness.
    Winick BJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 51(1):57-95. PubMed ID: 11660621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coercion in the community: issues for mature treatment systems.
    Diamond RJ
    New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1995; (66):3-18. PubMed ID: 7651301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outpatient commitment: a therapeutic jurisprudence analysis.
    Winick BJ
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 2003; 9(1-2):107-44. PubMed ID: 16700139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Mentally ill patient refuses treatment. How much coercion is allowed? (interview by Dr. Christine Starostzik)].
    Steinert T
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2013 Mar; 155(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 23614181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coercion in civil commitment: process, preferences, and outcome.
    Hiday VA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(4):359-77. PubMed ID: 1428420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The involuntary civil commitment of mentally ill persons in the United States and Romania: a comparative analysis.
    Loue S
    Rev Rom Bioet; 2003; 1(1):55-88. PubMed ID: 15011669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The health care proxy for mental illness: can it work and should we want it to?
    Sales GN
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(2):161-79. PubMed ID: 8364235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rotting with their rights on: why the criteria for ending commitment or restraint of liberty need not be the same as the criteria for initiating commitment or restraint of liberty, and how the restraint may sometimes justifiably continue after its prerequisites are no longer satisfied.
    Kress K
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):573-98. PubMed ID: 16883612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Making the case for a model mental health advance directive statute.
    Clausen JA
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2014; 14(1):1-65. PubMed ID: 25051651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oregon's civil commitment law: 140 years of change.
    Bloom JD; Williams MH
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1994 May; 45(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 8045542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.