These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12414207)
61. Informed consent, memory and age. Taub HA Gerontologist; 1980 Dec; 20(6):686-90. PubMed ID: 7203092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Attitudes Regarding Enrollment in a Genetic Research Project: An Informed Consent Simulation Study Comparing Views of People With Depression, Diabetes, and Neither Condition. Kim JP; Ryan K; Roberts LW J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Oct; 14(4):328-337. PubMed ID: 31328612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Informed consent comprehension in African research settings. Afolabi MO; Okebe JU; McGrath N; Larson HJ; Bojang K; Chandramohan D Trop Med Int Health; 2014 Jun; 19(6):625-642. PubMed ID: 24636078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Assessing whether consent for a clinical trial is voluntary. Horwitz RH; Roberts LW; Seal DW; Joseph P; Maschke KJ; Verdier RI; Nerette S; Pape JW; Fitzgerald DW Ann Intern Med; 2013 Feb; 158(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 23381054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Subjects agree to participate in environmental health studies without fully comprehending the associated risk. Lee R; Lampert S; Wilder L; Sowell AL Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 Mar; 8(3):830-41. PubMed ID: 21556181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. The role of numeracy in informed consent for surveys. Couper MP; Singer E J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Dec; 4(4):17-26. PubMed ID: 19919316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Patient comprehension of informed consent. Richardson V J Perioper Pract; 2013; 23(1-2):26-30. PubMed ID: 23413533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Communication and informed consent in clinical geriatrics. Ratzan RM Int J Aging Hum Dev; 1986; 23(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 3546159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Informed consent for research in a nursing home: processes and issues. Cohen-Mansfield J; Kerin P; Pawlson G; Lipson S; Holdridge K Gerontologist; 1988 Jun; 28(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 3396916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Awareness and motivation of Japanese donors of blood for research. Nakayama T; Muto K; Yoshiike N; Yokoyama T Am J Public Health; 1999 Sep; 89(9):1433-4. PubMed ID: 10474568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Effectiveness of multimedia aids to enhance comprehension of research consent information: a systematic review. Palmer BW; Lanouette NM; Jeste DV IRB; 2012; 34(6):1-15. PubMed ID: 23342734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Questionable informed consent of vulnerable pregnant research participants in South India - what a staff reminder poster does not say. Cook WA Nurs Ethics; 2015 Mar; 22(2):264-72. PubMed ID: 25802291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Informed consent in Indian patients. Sanwal AK; Kumar S; Sahni P; Nundy S J R Soc Med; 1996 Apr; 89(4):196-8. PubMed ID: 8676316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Assessing the readability of non-English-language consent forms: the case of Kiswahili for research conducted in Kenya. Kithinji C; Kass NE IRB; 2010; 32(4):10-5. PubMed ID: 20853798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Simplicity as progress: implications for fairness in research with human participants. Hurst SA Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(2):40-1. PubMed ID: 24521336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Vulnerability as a concept for health systems research. Lange MM Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(2):41-3. PubMed ID: 24521337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]