378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12415124)
1. Challenging dogma: thresholds for genotoxic carcinogens? The case of vinyl acetate.
Hengstler JG; Bogdanffy MS; Bolt HM; Oesch F
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol; 2003; 43():485-520. PubMed ID: 12415124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.
Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH
Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiating between local cytotoxicity, mitogenesis, and genotoxicity in carcinogen risk assessments: the case of vinyl acetate.
Bogdanffy MS; Valentine R
Toxicol Lett; 2003 Apr; 140-141():83-98. PubMed ID: 12676454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo Comet assay on isolated kidney cells to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens or cytotoxic compounds.
Nesslany F; Zennouche N; Simar-Meintières S; Talahari I; Nkili-Mboui EN; Marzin D
Mutat Res; 2007 Jun; 630(1-2):28-41. PubMed ID: 17507283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human carcinogenic risk evaluation, part II: contributions of the EUROTOX specialty section for carcinogenesis.
Bolt HM; Degen GH
Toxicol Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 15159528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vinyl acetate monomer (VAM) genotoxicity profile: relevance for carcinogenicity.
Albertini RJ
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 43(8):671-706. PubMed ID: 23985073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cyproterone acetate: a genotoxic carcinogen?
Kasper P
Pharmacol Toxicol; 2001 May; 88(5):223-31. PubMed ID: 11393581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytotoxicity and DNA-protein crosslink formation in rat nasal tissues exposed to vinyl acetate are carboxylesterase-mediated.
Kuykendall JR; Taylor ML; Bogdanffy MS
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1993 Dec; 123(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 8248935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Formation and repair of DNA adducts in vinyl chloride- and vinyl fluoride-induced carcinogenesis.
Swenberg JA; Bogdanffy MS; Ham A; Holt S; Kim A; Morinello EJ; Ranasinghe A; Scheller N; Upton PB
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (150):29-43. PubMed ID: 10626206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vinyl acetate induces intracellular acidification in mouse oral buccal epithelial cells.
Nakamoto T; Wagner M; Melvin JE; Bogdanffy MS
Toxicol Lett; 2005 Aug; 158(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 16039400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal.
O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low doses and thresholds in genotoxicity: from theories to experiments.
Zito R
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2001 Sep; 20(3):315-25. PubMed ID: 11718209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of alternative methods for establishing safe levels of occupational exposure to vinyl halides.
Storm JE; Rozman KK
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 25(3):240-55. PubMed ID: 9237327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of thresholds on the risk assessment of carcinogens in food.
Pratt I; Barlow S; Kleiner J; Larsen JC
Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 19442758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.
Hartwig A; Arand M; Epe B; Guth S; Jahnke G; Lampen A; Martus HJ; Monien B; Rietjens IMCM; Schmitz-Spanke S; Schriever-Schwemmer G; Steinberg P; Eisenbrand G
Arch Toxicol; 2020 Jun; 94(6):1787-1877. PubMed ID: 32542409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hormesis and dose-response-mediated mechanisms in carcinogenesis: evidence for a threshold in carcinogenicity of non-genotoxic carcinogens.
Fukushima S; Kinoshita A; Puatanachokchai R; Kushida M; Wanibuchi H; Morimura K
Carcinogenesis; 2005 Nov; 26(11):1835-45. PubMed ID: 15975961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the expression profiles induced by genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens in rat liver.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Stuart B; Wahle B; Bomann W; Ahr HJ
Mutat Res; 2005 Aug; 575(1-2):61-84. PubMed ID: 15890375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genotoxic thresholds, DNA repair, and susceptibility in human populations.
Jenkins GJ; Zaïr Z; Johnson GE; Doak SH
Toxicology; 2010 Dec; 278(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 19932733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A strategy for establishing mode of action of chemical carcinogens as a guide for approaches to risk assessments.
Butterworth BE; Conolly RB; Morgan KT
Cancer Lett; 1995 Jun; 93(1):129-46. PubMed ID: 7600540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]