BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12416366)

  • 1. Long-term focus pays off with perfect score.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2002 Nov; 27(11):154, 156-8. PubMed ID: 12416366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Take time to prepare, include others in survey preparation.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2002 Nov; 27(11):155. PubMed ID: 12416367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No surprises! Mastering the art of the survey--Part 2: Presentation, posture, and post-survival.
    QRC Advis; 1991 Nov; 8(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 10115335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Managing data for quality improvement.
    Darby M
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1998 Jun; 10(6):2-9. PubMed ID: 10180629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tips from a recent JCAHO survey.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Oct; 28(10):137-8, 143. PubMed ID: 14579765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating outcomes into the accreditation process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(1):1, 3. PubMed ID: 11009950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The secrets to surviving EC scrutiny: a good plan and even better training.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1995 Jul; 20(7):93-7. PubMed ID: 10153207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information management central to JCAHO surveys.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):161-2, 157-8. PubMed ID: 11188107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital performance measurement.
    Courtney JT; Petrillo M; Krumholz H; Meehan TP
    Conn Med; 2002 Oct; 66(10):633-4. PubMed ID: 12448216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Joint Commission veers from hard-line approach.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Mar; 25(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 11184089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint Commission survey questions and answers.
    Arnold S; Aziz G; Betcher J; Williams D; Threlkeld K; Stubblefield T
    Pharm Pract Manag Q; 1999 Apr; 19(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 10351610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preparing for an accreditation survey.
    Barrett JB
    Provider; 1996 Nov; 22(11):101-3. PubMed ID: 10166317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tailored surveys for corporately and functionally related services.
    JCAH Perspect; 1985; 5(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 10289652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is your accreditation at the mercy of a surveyors' mood or agenda?
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Dec; 23(12):213-6. PubMed ID: 10187256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The state of continuous survey readiness: is your facility ready for callers?
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):157-61. PubMed ID: 11188106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What the survey process expects of your organization.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Dec; 21(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 11766196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. You'll soon need to update your PPR every year.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Dec; 29(12):172-4. PubMed ID: 15597908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radical revision of survey process may ease compliance burden.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2002 Nov; 27(11):149-51. PubMed ID: 12416364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New JCAHO standards are here: what changes do you need to make now?
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Aug; 28(8):105-8. PubMed ID: 12884481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. JCAHO has beefed up training and education.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Dec; 23(12):216-8. PubMed ID: 10187257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.