These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12417797)

  • 1. Correlation of instrumental voice evaluation with perceptual voice analysis using a modified visual analog scale.
    Yu P; Revis J; Wuyts FL; Zanaret M; Giovanni A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(6):271-81. PubMed ID: 12417797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements.
    Yu P; Ouaknine M; Revis J; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 11792029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
    Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
    J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
    Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Relationship Between the Aerodynamic Parameters of Voice and Perceptual Evaluation in the Iranian Population With or Without Voice Disorders.
    Aghajanzadeh M; Darouie A; Dabirmoghaddam P; Salehi A; Rahgozar M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):250.e9-250.e15. PubMed ID: 27542776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
    Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
    Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.
    Ehrlich B; Lin L; Jiang J
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 30304342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory-perceptual Assessment of Healthy and Disordered Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.
    Contreras-Ruston F; Guzman M; Castillo-Allendes A; Cantor-Cutiva L; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):654-659. PubMed ID: 34903393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective voice analysis in dysphonic patients: new data including nonlinear measurements.
    Yu P; Garrel R; Nicollas R; Ouaknine M; Giovanni A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 17172783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity.
    Ma EP; Yiu EM
    J Voice; 2006 Sep; 20(3):380-90. PubMed ID: 16185841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cut-off analysis using visual analogue scale and cepstral assessments on severity of voice disorder.
    Lee YW; Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Dec; 43(4):175-180. PubMed ID: 29671679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Normal and Dysphonic Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.
    Yamasaki R; Madazio G; Leão SHS; Padovani M; Azevedo R; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 26873420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Influence of Voice Sample Length in the Auditory-Perceptual Judgment of Overall Voice Quality.
    Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):202-210. PubMed ID: 27539001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment practices of Irish speech and language therapists in the evaluation of voice disorders.
    Kenny C
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 28049390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Study on the concordance of objective multi-parameters analysis and perceptual evaluation].
    Yu P; Wang G; Zhang GJ; Tang AR; Wang RG
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 47(10):817-22. PubMed ID: 23302162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.