BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12418023)

  • 1. Tissue reaction and biodegradation of implanted cross-linked high amylose starch in rats.
    Désévaux C; Dubreuil P; Lenaerts V; Girard C
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(6):772-9. PubMed ID: 12418023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of subcutaneous Contramid implantation: host response and delivery of a potent analog of the growth hormone-releasing factor.
    Désévaux C; Girard C; Lenaerts V; Dubreuil P
    Int J Pharm; 2002 Jan; 232(1-2):119-29. PubMed ID: 11790495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Estimation of biocompatibility of fibers with large mechanical resistance].
    Zywicka B
    Polim Med; 2004; 34(3):3-48. PubMed ID: 15631154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo evaluation of tetrahedral amorphous carbon.
    LaVan DA; Padera RF; Friedmann TA; Sullivan JP; Langer R; Kohane DS
    Biomaterials; 2005 Feb; 26(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 15276354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo biodegradability and biocompatibility evaluation of novel alanine ester based polyphosphazenes in a rat model.
    Sethuraman S; Nair LS; El-Amin S; Farrar R; Nguyen MT; Singh A; Allcock HR; Greish YE; Brown PW; Laurencin CT
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Jun; 77(4):679-87. PubMed ID: 16514601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biocompatibility and safety evaluation of a ricinoleic acid-based poly(ester-anhydride) copolymer after implantation in rats.
    Vaisman B; Motiei M; Nyska A; Domb AJ
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Feb; 92(2):419-31. PubMed ID: 19191319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histological evaluation of different biodegradable and non-biodegradable membranes implanted subcutaneously in rats.
    Zhao S; Pinholt EM; Madsen JE; Donath K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr; 28(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 10958425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vivo study of the host response to starch-based polymers and composites subcutaneously implanted in rats.
    Marques AP; Reis RL; Hunt JA
    Macromol Biosci; 2005 Aug; 5(8):775-85. PubMed ID: 16080170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The question of the transmissibility of the results of subcutaneous tests of biomaterials from animals to humans].
    Schreiber H; Keller F; Kinzl HP; Hunger H; Knöfler W; Rübling U; Merten W
    Z Exp Chir Transplant Kunstliche Organe; 1990; 23(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 2219998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One year histopathological evaluation of fibrous tissue surrounding TCPL implants using adult rats as a model.
    Butler K; Benghuzzi H; Bajpai P; Puckett A; Tucci M; Cason Z; England B
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():233-9. PubMed ID: 9731364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biocompatibility of an adhesive system and 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate.
    Costa CA; Teixeira HM; do Nascimento AB; Hebling J
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(5):337-42, 294. PubMed ID: 10631890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Liver tissue responses to gelatin and gelatin/chitosan gels.
    Wang X; Yu X; Yan Y; Zhang R
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Oct; 87(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18080311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biocompatibility of different poly(lactide-coglycolide) polymers implanted into the subconjunctival space in rats.
    Rönkkö S; Kaarniranta K; Kalesnykas G; Uusitalo H
    Ophthalmic Res; 2011; 46(2):55-65. PubMed ID: 21228610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging of high-amylose starch tablets. 3. Initial diffusion and temperature effects.
    Thérien-Aubin H; Baille WE; Zhu XX; Marchessault RH
    Biomacromolecules; 2005; 6(6):3367-72. PubMed ID: 16283767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gentamicin supplementation of polyvinylidenfluoride mesh materials for infection prophylaxis.
    Junge K; Rosch R; Klinge U; Krones C; Klosterhalfen B; Mertens PR; Lynen P; Kunz D; Preiss A; Peltroche-Llacsahuanga H; Schumpelick V
    Biomaterials; 2005 Mar; 26(7):787-93. PubMed ID: 15350784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tissue response of defined collagen-elastin scaffolds in young and adult rats with special attention to calcification.
    Daamen WF; Nillesen ST; Hafmans T; Veerkamp JH; van Luyn MJ; van Kuppevelt TH
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jan; 26(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 15193883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Tissue reaction after implantation of ceramic biomaterials with introduced electrokinetic zeta potential on surface].
    Lewandowski R; Rutowski R; Staniszewska-Kuś J; Pielka S; Wnukiewicz B
    Polim Med; 2004; 34(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 15222224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo inflammatory and wound healing effects of gold electrode voltammetry for MEMS micro-reservoir drug delivery device.
    Voskerician G; Shawgo RS; Hiltner PA; Anderson JM; Cima MJ; Langer R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Apr; 51(4):627-35. PubMed ID: 15072217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Histologic evaluation of tissue response to sintered lanthanum-containing hydroxyapatites subcutaneously implanted in rats.
    Tanaka A; Nishimura Y; Sakaki T; Fujita A; Shin-ike T
    J Osaka Dent Univ; 1989 Oct; 23(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 2701292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization and biocompatibility of organogels based on L-alanine for parenteral drug delivery implants.
    Motulsky A; Lafleur M; Couffin-Hoarau AC; Hoarau D; Boury F; Benoit JP; Leroux JC
    Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(31):6242-53. PubMed ID: 15916802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.