These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12419008)

  • 1. Protecting the ingroup stereotype: ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members.
    Castano E; Paladino MP; Coull A; Yzerbyt VY
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2002 Sep; 41(Pt 3):365-85. PubMed ID: 12419008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corralling the ingroup: deviant derogation and perception of group variability.
    Hutchison P; Abrams D; De Moura GR
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(3):334-50. PubMed ID: 23724703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When exceptions prove the rule: how extremity of deviance determines the impact of deviant examples on stereotypes.
    Kunda Z; Oleson KC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1997 May; 72(5):965-79. PubMed ID: 9150579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Group meaningfulness and the causal direction of influence between the ingroup and the self or another individual: Evidence from the Induction-Deduction Paradigm.
    Cadinu M; Carnaghi A; Guizzo F
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229321. PubMed ID: 32155168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Justice reactions to deviant ingroup members: Ingroup identity threat motivates utilitarian punishments.
    Fousiani K; Yzerbyt V; Kteily NS; Demoulin S
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 58(4):869-893. PubMed ID: 30648270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do people perceive ingroup homogeneity on ingroup traits and outgroup homogeneity on outgroup traits?
    Rubin M; Badea C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jan; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 17178928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rejecting ingroup loyalty for the truth: Children's and adolescents' evaluations of deviant peers within a misinformation intergroup context.
    Farooq A; Adlam A; Rutland A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2024 Jul; 243():105923. PubMed ID: 38593709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.
    Steain A; Stanton CJ; Stevens CJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0222975. PubMed ID: 31618216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: development of the black sheep effect.
    Abrams D; Palmer SB; Rutland A; Cameron L; Van de Vyver J
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Jan; 50(1):258-70. PubMed ID: 23544855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of stereotypes on attitude inference: outgroups are black and white, ingroups are shaded.
    Vonk R
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2002 Mar; 41(Pt 1):157-67. PubMed ID: 11970780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of exemplar activation on mental representations of the ingroup: the moderating role of relative ingroup size.
    Coats S; Bayer ER; Worthen JB
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(2):219-36. PubMed ID: 17650919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cognitive representation of self-stereotyping.
    Latrofa M; Vaes J; Cadinu M; Carnaghi A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jul; 36(7):911-22. PubMed ID: 20519574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exclusion as self-protection: the function of subtypes for ingroup members.
    Parks-Stamm EJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 May; 39(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 23471318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of stereotype-incongruent information on perceived group variability and stereotype change.
    Garcia-Marques L; Mackie DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1999 Nov; 77(5):979-90. PubMed ID: 10573875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Not one of us": predictors and consequences of denying ingroup characteristics to ambiguous targets.
    Kteily N; Cotterill S; Sidanius J; Sheehy-Skeffington J; Bergh R
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1231-47. PubMed ID: 24986839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-stereotyping: the central role of an ingroup threatening identity.
    Latrofa M; Vaes J; Cadinu M
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(1):92-111. PubMed ID: 22308763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereotypes and social judgment: the effects of typicality and group heterogeneity.
    Lambert AJ; Wyer RS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1990 Oct; 59(4):676-91. PubMed ID: 2254850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Membership status and subjective group dynamics: who triggers the black sheep effect?
    Pinto IR; Marques JM; Levine JM; Abrams D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Jul; 99(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 20565188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: when will we denigrate negative ingroup members?
    Lewis AC; Sherman SJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 20397595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implicit ingroup metafavoritism: subtle preference for ingroup members displaying ingroup bias.
    Castelli L; Tomelleri S; Zogmaister C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 18359956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.