188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12419454)
1. Inverse planning for interstitial gynecologic template brachytherapy: truly anatomy-based planning.
Lessard E; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Nov; 54(4):1243-51. PubMed ID: 12419454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A fast inverse treatment planning strategy facilitating optimized catheter selection in image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy.
Guthier CV; Damato AL; Hesser JW; Viswanathan AN; Cormack RA
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6117-6127. PubMed ID: 28921538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison between tandem and ovoids and interstitial gynecologic template brachytherapy dosimetry using a hypothetical computer model.
Hsu IC; Speight J; Hai J; Vigneault E; Phillips T; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Feb; 52(2):538-43. PubMed ID: 11872302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and evaluation of an automatic interstitial catheter digitization tool for adaptive high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Dise J; Liang X; Scheuermann J; Anamalayil S; Mesina C; Lin LL; Teo BK
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 26073225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D inverse treatment planning for the tandem and ovoid applicator in cervical cancer.
Dewitt KD; Hsu IC; Speight J; Weinberg VK; Lessard E; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(4):1270-4. PubMed ID: 16253782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving the dosimetric coverage of interstitial high-dose-rate breast implants.
Kestin LL; Jaffray DA; Edmundson GK; Martinez AA; Wong JW; Kini VR; Chen PY; Vicini FA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 10656370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early clinical experience with anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization for high-dose-rate boost of the prostate.
Lachance B; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Lessard E; Chrétien M; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L; Vigneault E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 12182978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.
Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control for rotating-shield brachytherapy.
Liu Y; Flynn RT; Kim Y; Wu X
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111709. PubMed ID: 25370623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer with adaptive simulated annealing and gradient descent.
Yao R; Templeton AK; Liao Y; Turian JV; Kiel KD; Chu JC
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 24359671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Demonstration of simulated annealing optimization for permanent breast seed implant treatment planning.
Roumeliotis M; Yates B; Watt E; Frederick A; Meyer T
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(3):615-620. PubMed ID: 29396035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Fu Q; Xu Y; Zuo J; An J; Huang M; Yang X; Chen J; Yan H; Dai J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 33626225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of anatomy-based dwell position and inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison to a conventional cylindrical dwell position, geometric optimization, and dose-point optimization.
Yoshioka Y; Nishimura T; Kamata M; Harada H; Kanazawa K; Fuji H; Murayama S
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 15890425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The syed temporary interstitial iridium gynaecological implant: an inverse planning system.
Fung AY
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):N203-8. PubMed ID: 12222864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of IPSA with dose-point optimization and manual optimization for interstitial template brachytherapy for gynecologic cancers.
Jamema SV; Sharma S; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Shrivastava SK; Deshpande DD
Brachytherapy; 2011; 10(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 21030317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dwell time modulation restrictions do not necessarily improve treatment plan quality for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Balvert M; Gorissen BL; den Hertog D; Hoffmann AL
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(2):537-48. PubMed ID: 25549084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
