These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12420399)
41. "Any Willing Provider" laws not preempted by Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. et. al. v. Miller, Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Insurance. Benefits Q; 2004; 20(3):69-70. PubMed ID: 15453199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A perspective from within the white coat. Chow RD Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():171-5. PubMed ID: 12669326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Pegram v. Herdrich. A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision threatens patients and physicians. Geist RW Minn Med; 2002 Jul; 85(7):6, 58-9. PubMed ID: 12152532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Managed care. New call for patients' bill of rights. Docs worry ruling limiting HMO suits will boost medical malpractice filings. Benko LB Mod Healthc; 2004 Jun; 34(26):12. PubMed ID: 15242105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Pegram's significance for managed health care. Saccoccio L Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():195-201. PubMed ID: 12669329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Dividing loyalties: caring for individuals and populations. Jecker NS Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():177-86. PubMed ID: 12669327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Pegram v. Herdrich. 530 U.S. 211 (2000). Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():159-60. PubMed ID: 12669324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Mismanaged care: the challenges facing judicial interpretation of contemporary health policy. Schlesinger M Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():203-13. PubMed ID: 12669330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Pegram v. Herdrich: a victory for HMOs or the beginning of the end for ERISA preemption? Borzi PC Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():161-9. PubMed ID: 12669325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. To preempt or not to preempt: HMO liability pre and post Pegram v. Herdrich. Glassman AD J Law Health; 2003-2004; 18(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16521889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Upon further review. 'External review' of medical claim denials is now the law of the land nearly nationwide. But the system has its fans and foes. Benko LB Mod Healthc; 2005 Feb; 35(6):28-31, 35. PubMed ID: 15730203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Alternatives available. Appeals court upholds Washington state mandate. Rauber C Mod Healthc; 1998 Jul; 28(28):48, 59. PubMed ID: 10181362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Federal jurisdiction--preemption--state antisubrogation law--state law regulating insurance saved from preemption. Singh v. Prudential Health Care Plan. Benefits Q; 2005; 21(3):60-1. PubMed ID: 16248231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Will ERISA law become a sword instead of a shield? Capitation Manag Rep; 1997 Aug; 4(8):129-31. PubMed ID: 10175789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Pegram v. Herdrich: On peritonitis, preemption, and the elusive goal of managed care accountability. Hammer PJ J Health Polit Policy Law; 2001 Aug; 26(4):767-87. PubMed ID: 11523963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Breach of fiduciary duty lawsuits against MCOs. What's left after Pegram v. Herdrich? Rosoff AJ J Leg Med; 2001 Mar; 22(1):55-75. PubMed ID: 11330124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The legal challenge to ERISA preemptions. Hrehor KM; Renick O Empl Benefits J; 2001 Mar; 26(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11272512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Health plan liability. Coleman D Healthplan; 1997; 38(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 10176856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. ERISA shield is cracked; HMOs open to liability. Improves legal atmosphere for physicians, patients. Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Pa Med; 1999 Feb; 102(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 10070189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]