These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12420967)

  • 21. Effects of gap size and UV dosage on decolorization of C.I. Acid Blue 113 wastewater in the UV/H2O2 process.
    Shu HY; Chang MC; Fan HJ
    J Hazard Mater; 2005 Feb; 118(1-3):205-11. PubMed ID: 15721545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nitrification of high-strength ammonium wastewater by a fluidized-bed reactor.
    Botrous AE; Dahab MF; Miháltz P
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):65-71. PubMed ID: 15137408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of temperature, salinity, and carbon: nitrogen ratio on sequencing batch reactor treating shrimp aquaculture wastewater.
    Fontenot Q; Bonvillain C; Kilgen M; Boopathy R
    Bioresour Technol; 2007 Jul; 98(9):1700-3. PubMed ID: 16935499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Low-biodegradable composite chemical wastewater treatment by biofilm configured sequencing batch reactor (SBBR).
    Mohan SV; Rao NC; Sarma PN
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jun; 144(1-2):108-17. PubMed ID: 17097228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Commissioning and operational experiences for the 160ML/d Woodman Point Sequencing Batch Reactor--control of settleability and denitrification using bioselectors.
    Bagg WK; Newland MC; Rule H
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):213-20. PubMed ID: 15553478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A pilot scale study of a sequencing batch reactor treating municipal wastewater operated via the UP-PND process.
    Kornaros M; Marazioti C; Lyberatos G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(2):435-8. PubMed ID: 18701797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Removal of endocrine disrupter compounds from municipal wastewater by an innovative biological technology.
    Balest L; Mascolo G; Di Iaconi C; Lopez A
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(4):953-6. PubMed ID: 18776635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Municipal wastewater treatment through an aerobic biofilm SBR integrated with a submerged filtration bed.
    Yang K; He J; Dougherty M; Yang X; Li L
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(5):917-26. PubMed ID: 19273890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new low-cost biofilm carrier for the treatment of municipal wastewater in a moving bed reactor.
    Orantes JC; González-Martínez S
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):243-50. PubMed ID: 14753543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wastewater management in Greece: experience and lessons for developing countries.
    Tsagarakis KP; Mara DD; Angelakis AN
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(6):163-72. PubMed ID: 11700656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Feasibility of nitrification/denitrification in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor with liquid circulation applied to post-treatment.
    Andrade do Canto CS; Rodrigues JA; Ratusznei SM; Zaiat M; Foresti E
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Feb; 99(3):644-54. PubMed ID: 17336516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimizing nitrogen removal in the BioDenitro process.
    Irizar I; Suescun J; Plaza F; Larrea L
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):429-36. PubMed ID: 14753565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sequencing batch reactor treatment of tannery wastewater for carbon and nitrogen removal.
    Murat S; Ateş Gencell E; Taşli R; Artan N; Orhon D
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(9):219-27. PubMed ID: 12448472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nitrogen removal using a vertically moving biofilm system.
    Rodgers M; Burke D
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 12578176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Moving bed biofilm reactors: a small-scale treatment solution.
    Daude D; Stephenson T
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):251-7. PubMed ID: 14753544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of prefermentation on denitrifying phosphorus removal in slaughterhouse wastewater.
    Merzouki M; Bernet N; Delgenès JP; Benlemlih M
    Bioresour Technol; 2005 Aug; 96(12):1317-22. PubMed ID: 15792577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Start-up of an aerobic granular sequencing batch reactor for the treatment of winery wastewater.
    López-Palau S; Dosta J; Mata-Alvarez J
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(4):1049-54. PubMed ID: 19700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Technical-economical analysis of selected decentralized technologies for municipal wastewater treatment in the city of Rome.
    Gavasci R; Chiavola A; Spizzirri M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(6):1371-8. PubMed ID: 20861552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR) for biological nutrient removal from simulated wastewater containing glucose as carbon source.
    Kumar BM; Chaudhari S
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(3):73-9. PubMed ID: 14518857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance and microbial structure of a combined biofilm reactor.
    Guo H; Zhou J; Jing W; Zhang X; Zhang Z; Uddin MS
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2005 Jul; 27(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 15838635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.