These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12421063)

  • 1. Perceptual processes in matching and recognition of complex pictures.
    Lamberts K; Brockdorff N; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Oct; 28(5):1176-91. PubMed ID: 12421063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
    Lamberts K; Kent C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feature binding in perceptual priming and in episodic object recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Groh-Bordin C; Zimmer HD; Mecklinger A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 16099366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The prioritization of perceptual processing in categorization.
    Guest D; Lamberts K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1079-96. PubMed ID: 20436202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speeded old-new recognition of multidimensional perceptual stimuli: modeling performance at the individual-participant and individual-item levels.
    Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 16634673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory.
    Schendan HE; Kutas M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 May; 19(5):734-49. PubMed ID: 17488201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feature-sampling and random-walk models of individual-stimulus recognition.
    Lamberts K; Brockdorff N; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Sep; 132(3):351-78. PubMed ID: 13678373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induced gamma-band activity elicited by visual representation of unattended objects.
    Martinovic J; Gruber T; Ohla K; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 18476754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age of acquisition affects object recognition: evidence from visual duration thresholds.
    Dent K; Catling JC; Johnston RA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):301-18. PubMed ID: 17055443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Picture processing in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Truppa V; Spinozzi G; Stegagno T; Fagot J
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):140-52. PubMed ID: 19501136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory-visual intermodal matching based on individual recognition in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).
    Martinez L; Matsuzawa T
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Oct; 12 Suppl 1():S71-85. PubMed ID: 19701656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Towards a deterioration of the structural and perceptive representations of objects in physiological aging?].
    Ehrlé N; Goudour A; Legrand A; Bakchine S
    Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil; 2008 Jun; 6(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 18556273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of structural diagnostics in recognition.
    Fox J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Feb; 104(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 1141836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The recognition of partially visible natural objects in the presence and absence of their occluders.
    Johnson JS; Olshausen BA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3262-76. PubMed ID: 16043208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objects and events as determinants of parallel processing in dual tasks: evidence from the backward compatibility effect.
    Ellenbogen R; Meiran N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):152-67. PubMed ID: 20718573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.
    Lawson R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):911-30. PubMed ID: 19653738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal preparation facilitates perceptual identification of letters.
    Rolke B
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1305-13. PubMed ID: 18927012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.