These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12421396)

  • 1. Ethical review of health service research in the UK: implications for nursing.
    Tod AM; Nicolson P; Allmark P
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Nov; 40(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 12421396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest.
    Cave E; Holm S
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Oct; 28(5):318-21. PubMed ID: 12356961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconsidering 'ethics' and 'quality' in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm.
    Stevenson FA; Gibson W; Pelletier C; Chrysikou V; Park S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 May; 16():21. PubMed ID: 25952678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethics approval, guarantees of quality and the meddlesome editor.
    Long T; Fallon D
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1398-404. PubMed ID: 17655528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical research 2: Legal and ethical issues in research.
    Endacott R
    Accid Emerg Nurs; 2007 Jul; 15(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 17289389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Members of research ethics committees accepted a modification of the randomized consent design.
    Schellings R; Kessels AG; Ter Riet G; Kleijnen J; Leffers P; Knottnerus JA; Sturmans F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 15878472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Law, ethics and research ethics committees.
    Beyleveld D
    Med Law; 2002; 21(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 12017445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
    Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research governance and ethics: a resource for novice researchers.
    Fontenla M; Rycroft-Malone J
    Nurs Stand; 2006 Feb 15-21; 20(23):41-6. PubMed ID: 16514927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined.
    Angell EL; Bryman A; Ashcroft RE; Dixon-Woods M
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Apr; 17(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18385408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A; Bartholomew K; Aagaard N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0235618. PubMed ID: 32756563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research.
    Cassell J; Young A
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Oct; 28(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 12356960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.
    Taljaard M; Weijer C; Grimshaw JM; Ali A; Brehaut JC; Campbell MK; Carroll K; Edwards S; Eldridge S; Forrest CB; Giraudeau B; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Hemming K; Hey SP; Horn AR; Jairath V; Klassen TP; London AJ; Marlin S; Marshall JC; McIntyre L; McKenzie JE; Nicholls SG; Alison Paprica P; Zwarenstein M; Fergusson DA
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):525. PubMed ID: 30261933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential solutions to improve the governance of multicentre health services research.
    Clay-Williams R; Taylor N; Braithwaite J
    Med J Aust; 2018 Mar; 208(4):152-154. PubMed ID: 29490214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond regulatory approaches to ethics: making space for ethical preparedness in healthcare research.
    Lyle K; Weller S; Samuel G; Lucassen AM
    J Med Ethics; 2023 May; 49(5):352-356. PubMed ID: 35725300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children?
    Angell E; Biggs H; Gahleitner F; Dixon-Woods M
    Arch Dis Child; 2010 Nov; 95(11):915-7. PubMed ID: 20573742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Issues of patient consent: a study of paediatric high-dependency care.
    Rushforth K; McKinney PA
    Br J Nurs; 2005 May 12-25; 14(9):519-23. PubMed ID: 15924004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Action research: politics, ethics and participation.
    Williamson GR; Prosser S
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Dec; 40(5):587-93. PubMed ID: 12437608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel framework for reflecting on the functioning of research ethics review panels.
    Macduff C; McKie A; Martindale S; Rennie AM; West B; Wilcock S
    Nurs Ethics; 2007 Jan; 14(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 17334174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.