These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12421396)

  • 21. Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements?
    Dixon-Woods M; Angell EL
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 19482983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers.
    Shearman K; Masters A; Nutt D; Bowman S; Draper H
    BMJ Open; 2022 Jun; 12(6):e055208. PubMed ID: 35715186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do Australian researchers accept committee review and conduct ethical research?
    McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW
    Soc Sci Med; 1992 Aug; 35(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 1519084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is It Time to Re-Evaluate the Ethics Governance of Social Media Research?
    Samuel G; Ahmed W; Kara H; Jessop C; Quinton S; Sanger S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):452-454. PubMed ID: 30141738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Busting the bureaucracy: lessons from research governance in primary care.
    Appleton J; Caan W; Cowley S; Kendall S
    Community Pract; 2007 Feb; 80(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 17330671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ethical approval for national studies in Ireland: an illustration of current challenges.
    Smith M; Doyle F; McGee HM; De La Harpe D
    Ir J Med Sci; 2004; 173(2):72-4. PubMed ID: 15540705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The ethics and governance of medical research: what does regulation have to do with morality?
    Ashcroft RE
    New Rev Bioeth; 2003 Nov; 1(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 15706668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
    Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
    Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research.
    Tansey CM; Anderson J; Boulanger RF; Eckenwiler L; Pringle J; Schwartz L; Hunt M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 28659166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Applying for ethical approval for research: the main issues.
    Gelling L
    Nurs Stand; 2016 Jan; 30(20):40-4. PubMed ID: 26758167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ethical dilemmas in nonclinical health research from a UK perspective.
    Grinyer A
    Nurs Ethics; 2001 Mar; 8(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 16010887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Guidance on Making Proposals to Conduct Gene Therapy Research on Human Subjects.
    Gene Therapy Advisory Committee (Great Britain)
    Gene Ther; 1994 Nov; 1(6):343-363 (inset). PubMed ID: 11644650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Small is beautiful: demystifying and simplifying standard operating procedures: a model from the ethics review and consultancy committee of the Cameroon Bioethics Initiative.
    Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer O; Munung NS; Tangwa GB
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 May; 17(1):27. PubMed ID: 27178053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries.
    Silverman H; Sleem H; Moodley K; Kumar N; Naidoo S; Subramanian T; Jaafar R; Moni M
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 41(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 24748650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The ethical governance and regulation of student projects: a draft proposal.
    Doyal L
    Bull Med Ethics; 2004 Nov; (203):8-11. PubMed ID: 15816101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The other face of research governance.
    Jones AM; Bamford B
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):280-1. PubMed ID: 15284155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomedical Research Ethics Committees in sub-Saharan Africa: a collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes.
    Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 25819759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Journalists, district attorneys and researchers: why IRBs should get in the middle.
    Chodos AH; Lee SJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 16():19. PubMed ID: 25889147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.