These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12421664)

  • 1. Visual marking for search: behavioral and event-related potential analyses.
    Jacobsen T; Humphreys GW; Schröger E; Roeber U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):410-21. PubMed ID: 12421664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
    Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis.
    Mavritsaki E; Humphreys G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1553-67. PubMed ID: 27243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blink and you won't miss it: the preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks.
    von Mühlenen A; Watson D; Gunnell DO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1279-90. PubMed ID: 23398259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Jan; 104(1):90-122. PubMed ID: 9009881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological correlates of active suppression and attentional selection in preview visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Nov; 120():75-85. PubMed ID: 30359651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contingent visual marking by transients.
    Peterson MS; Belopolsky AV; Kramer AF
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):695-710. PubMed ID: 12956578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual search in temporally segregated displays: converging operations in the study of the preview benefit.
    Belopolsky AV; Peterson MS; Kramer AF
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 16099358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERP effects of spatial attention and display search with unilateral and bilateral stimulus displays.
    Lange JJ; Wijers AA; Mulder LJ; Mulder G
    Biol Psychol; 1999 Jul; 50(3):203-33. PubMed ID: 10461806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking.
    Meinhardt G; Persike M
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):13. PubMed ID: 26382004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories.
    Nako R; Wu R; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 23796065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking.
    Yamauchi K; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():200-211. PubMed ID: 30530171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facilitation of visual search at new positions: a behavioral and ERP study of new object capture.
    Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Humphreys GW; Roeber U
    Neuroreport; 2001 Dec; 12(18):4161-4. PubMed ID: 11742257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional set protects visual marking from visual transients.
    Osugi T; Kawahara JI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):69-90. PubMed ID: 22834464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual marking of moving objects: a role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):946-62. PubMed ID: 9627427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional Capture to a Singleton Distractor Degrades Visual Marking in Visual Search.
    Yamauchi K; Osugi T; Murakami I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():801. PubMed ID: 28559878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.