These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12422945)

  • 1. A comparison of the OnTrak Testcup-5 to laboratory urinalysis among arrestees.
    Yacoubian GS; Wish ED; Choyka JD
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2002; 34(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 12422945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of saliva testing to urinalysis in an arrestee population.
    Yacoubian GS; Wish ED; Pérez DM
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2001; 33(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 11718322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of ONTRAK TESTCUP, abuscreen ONTRAK, abuscreen ONLINE, and GC/MS urinalysis test results.
    Crouch DJ; Cheever ML; Andrenyak DM; Kuntz DJ; Loughmiller DL
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9456522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between instant and laboratory oral fluid analysis among arrestees.
    Yacoubian GS; Wish ED
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2006 Jun; 38(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 16903460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of the instant-view 5-panel test card with OnTrak TesTcup Pro 5: comparison with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
    Moody DE; Fang WB; Andrenyak DM; Monti KM; Jones C
    J Anal Toxicol; 2006; 30(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 16620532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ONTRAK TESTCUP: a novel, on-site, multi-analyte screen for the detection of abused drugs.
    Towt J; Tsai SC; Hernandez MR; Klimov AD; Kravec CV; Rouse SL; Subuhi HS; Twarowska B; Salamone SJ
    J Anal Toxicol; 1995 Oct; 19(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 8926746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drug screening and confirmation by GC-MS: comparison of EMIT II and Online KIMS against 10 drugs between US and England laboratories.
    Lu NT; Taylor BG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157(2-3):106-16. PubMed ID: 15899564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring benzodiazepine use among Houston arrestees.
    Yacoubian GS; Urbach BJ; Larsen KL; Johnson RJ; Peters RJ
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2002; 34(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 12562107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the OnTrak Testcup-er on-site urine drug-testing device for drugs commonly encountered from emergency departments.
    Peace MR; Poklis JL; Tarnai LD; Poklis A
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002 Oct; 26(7):500-3. PubMed ID: 12423007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of the multiple drugs immunoassay test for rapid detection of drug abuse in postmortem urine.
    Srisont S; Chirachariyavej T; Peonim AV
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Nov; 93(11):1301-9. PubMed ID: 21114210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A tale of two drug testing technologies: GC-MS and LC-MS/MS.
    Mikel C; Pesce A; West C
    Pain Physician; 2010; 13(1):91-2. PubMed ID: 20119467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the validity of self-reported recent drug use between adult and juvenile arrestees.
    Yacoubian GS; VanderWall KL; Johnson RJ; Urbach BJ; Peters RJ
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2003; 35(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 12924751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results of hair analyses for drugs of abuse and comparison with self-reports and urine tests.
    Musshoff F; Driever F; Lachenmeier K; Lachenmeier DW; Banger M; Madea B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jan; 156(2-3):118-23. PubMed ID: 16410161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emergency department evaluation of a rapid assay for detection of cocaine metabolites in urine specimens.
    Belfer RA; Klein BL; Boenning DA; Soldin SJ
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 1996 Apr; 12(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 8859922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Underreporting of illicit drug use by patients at emergency departments as revealed by two-tiered urinalysis.
    Chen WJ; Fang CC; Shyu RS; Lin KC
    Addict Behav; 2006 Dec; 31(12):2304-8. PubMed ID: 16564643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring alcohol and drug dependence with New York City ADAM data.
    Yacoubian GS
    J Subst Abuse Treat; 2003 Jun; 24(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 12867208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Urine drug testing for social service agencies in Nova Scotia, Canada.
    Fraser AD
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):194-6. PubMed ID: 9456542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of clonazepam compliance by measurement of urinary concentration by immunoassay and LC-MS/MS in pain management population.
    West R; Pesce A; West C; Crews B; Mikel C; Almazan P; Rosenthal M; Latyshev S
    Pain Physician; 2010; 13(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 20119465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reanalysis of forensic urine specimens containing benzoylecgonine and THC-COOH.
    Romberg RW; Past MR
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Mar; 39(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 8195759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of immunoassay with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) of urine drug testing (UDT) opioids and illicit drugs in chronic pain patients.
    Manchikanti L; Malla Y; Wargo BW; Fellows B
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 21412372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.