These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12423007)

  • 1. An evaluation of the OnTrak Testcup-er on-site urine drug-testing device for drugs commonly encountered from emergency departments.
    Peace MR; Poklis JL; Tarnai LD; Poklis A
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002 Oct; 26(7):500-3. PubMed ID: 12423007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ONTRAK TESTCUP: a novel, on-site, multi-analyte screen for the detection of abused drugs.
    Towt J; Tsai SC; Hernandez MR; Klimov AD; Kravec CV; Rouse SL; Subuhi HS; Twarowska B; Salamone SJ
    J Anal Toxicol; 1995 Oct; 19(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 8926746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative evaluation of the instant-view 5-panel test card with OnTrak TesTcup Pro 5: comparison with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
    Moody DE; Fang WB; Andrenyak DM; Monti KM; Jones C
    J Anal Toxicol; 2006; 30(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 16620532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluation of four on-site drug-testing devices for detection of drugs of abuse in urine.
    Peace MR; Tarnai LD; Poklis A
    J Anal Toxicol; 2000 Oct; 24(7):589-94. PubMed ID: 11043664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multiple-site laboratory evaluation of three on-site urinalysis drug-testing devices.
    Crouch DJ; Frank JF; Farrell LJ; Karsch HM; Klaunig JE
    J Anal Toxicol; 1998 Oct; 22(6):493-502. PubMed ID: 9788525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Triage PPY on-site testing device for the detection of dextropropoxyphene in urine.
    Poklis A; Poklis JL; Tarnai LD; Backer RC
    J Anal Toxicol; 2004 Sep; 28(6):485-8. PubMed ID: 15516300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of ONTRAK TESTCUP, abuscreen ONTRAK, abuscreen ONLINE, and GC/MS urinalysis test results.
    Crouch DJ; Cheever ML; Andrenyak DM; Kuntz DJ; Loughmiller DL
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9456522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A field evaluation of five on-site drug-testing devices.
    Crouch DJ; Hersch RK; Cook RF; Frank JF; Walsh JM
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002 Oct; 26(7):493-9. PubMed ID: 12423006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the triage system for emergency drugs-of-abuse testing in urine.
    Wu AH; Wong SS; Johnson KG; Callies J; Shu DX; Dunn WE; Wong SH
    J Anal Toxicol; 1993; 17(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 8371556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Microgenics CEDIA heroin metabolite (6-AM) and the Roche Abuscreen ONLINE opiate immunoassays for the detection of heroin use in forensic urine samples.
    Holler JM; Bosy TZ; Klette KL; Wiegand R; Jemionek J; Jacobs A
    J Anal Toxicol; 2004 Sep; 28(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 15516301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring opiate use in substance abuse treatment patients with sweat and urine drug testing.
    Huestis MA; Cone EJ; Wong CJ; Umbricht A; Preston KL
    J Anal Toxicol; 2000 Oct; 24(7):509-21. PubMed ID: 11043653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of EMIT II, CEDIA, and DPC RIA assays for the detection of lysergic acid diethylamide in forensic urine samples.
    Wiegand RF; Klette KL; Stout PR; Gehlhausen JM
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002 Oct; 26(7):519-23. PubMed ID: 12423010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of five immunoassays for the analysis of alprazolam and triazolam metabolites in urine: effect of lowering the screening and GC-MS cut-off values.
    Fraser AD; Meatherall R
    J Anal Toxicol; 1996; 20(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 8835658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drug screening and confirmation by GC-MS: comparison of EMIT II and Online KIMS against 10 drugs between US and England laboratories.
    Lu NT; Taylor BG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157(2-3):106-16. PubMed ID: 15899564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Method comparison of the Ortho Vitros Fusion 5,1 chemistry analyzer and the Roche COBAS Integra 400 for urine drug screen testing in the emergency department.
    Johnson-Davis KL; Thompson CD; Clark CJ; McMillin GA; Lehman CM
    J Anal Toxicol; 2012 Jun; 36(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 22582270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emergency department evaluation of a rapid assay for detection of cocaine metabolites in urine specimens.
    Belfer RA; Klein BL; Boenning DA; Soldin SJ
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 1996 Apr; 12(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 8859922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the OnTrak Testcup-5 to laboratory urinalysis among arrestees.
    Yacoubian GS; Wish ED; Choyka JD
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2002; 34(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 12422945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between drug screening by immunoassay and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry in post-mortem urine.
    Sundström M; Pelander A; Ojanperä I
    Drug Test Anal; 2015 May; 7(5):420-7. PubMed ID: 24953563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drug screening in urine by cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA) and kinetic interaction of microparticles in solution (KIMS): a comparative study.
    Schwettmann L; Külpmann WR; Vidal C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 16599844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of drugs of abuse detection in meconium by EMIT II and ELISA.
    Marin SJ; Keith L; Merrell M; McMillin GA
    J Anal Toxicol; 2009 Apr; 33(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 19371463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.