228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12423404)
1. Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances.
Frosch PJ; Johansen JD; Menné T; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Goossens A; Lepoittevin JP; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Aug; 47(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 12423404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix.
Frosch PJ; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15859993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products.
Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series.
Bruze M; Andersen KE; Goossens A; ;
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18279149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances.
Frosch PJ; Johansen JD; Menné T; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Goossens A; Lepoittevin JP; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Nov; 47(5):279-87. PubMed ID: 12534532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patch tests with fragrance mix II and its components.
Pónyai G; Németh I; Altmayer A; Nagy G; Irinyi B; Battyáni Z; Temesvári E;
Dermatitis; 2012; 23(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 22653122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selected oxidized fragrance terpenes are common contact allergens.
Matura M; Sköld M; Börje A; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Frosch P; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Svedman C; White IR; Karlberg AT
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):320-8. PubMed ID: 15932583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China.
Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances.
van Oosten EJ; Schuttelaar ML; Coenraads PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Oct; 61(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 19825093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I).
Larsen W; Nakayama H; Lindberg M; Fischer T; Elsner P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott J
Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Jun; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 8796746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lyral is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances.
Frosch PJ; Johansen JD; Menné T; Rastogi SC; Bruze M; Andersen KE; Lepoittevin JP; Giménez Arnau E; Pirker C; Goossens A; White IR
Br J Dermatol; 1999 Dec; 141(6):1076-83. PubMed ID: 10606855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contact reactions to fragrances.
Katsarou A; Armenaka M; Kalogeromitros D; Koufou V; Georgala S
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1999 May; 82(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 10353576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes.
Frosch PJ; Pilz B; Andersen KE; Burrows D; Camarasa JG; Dooms-Goossens A; Ducombs G; Fuchs T; Hannuksela M; Lachapelle JM
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Nov; 33(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 8565489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contact allergy to farnesol in 2021 consecutively patch tested patients. Results of the IVDK.
Schnuch A; Uter W; Geier J; Lessmann H; Frosch PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Mar; 50(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 15153123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fragrance contact dermatitis in Korea: a joint study.
An S; Lee AY; Lee CH; Kim DW; Hahm JH; Kim KJ; Moon KC; Won YH; Ro YS; Eun HC
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Dec; 53(6):320-3. PubMed ID: 16364118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch testing with fine fragrances: comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series.
Trattner A; David M
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Dec; 49(6):287-9. PubMed ID: 15025700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitization to 26 fragrances to be labelled according to current European regulation. Results of the IVDK and review of the literature.
Schnuch A; Uter W; Geier J; Lessmann H; Frosch PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jul; 57(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17577350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fragrance contact allergy: a 4-year retrospective study.
Cuesta L; Silvestre JF; Toledo F; Lucas A; Pérez-Crespo M; Ballester I
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Aug; 63(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 20573166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to fragrance mix.
Devos SA; Constandt L; Tupker RA; Noz KC; Lucker GP; Bruynzeel DP; Schuttelaar ML; Kruyswijk MR; van Zuuren EJ; Vink J; Coenraads PJ; Kiemeney LA; van der Valk PG
Dermatitis; 2008; 19(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18346396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
