These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12423867)

  • 1. Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Bernstein S; Kaunitz AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 100(5 Pt 1):997-1002. PubMed ID: 12423867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induction of labour for suspected macrosomia at term in non-diabetic women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Magro-Malosso ER; Saccone G; Chen M; Navathe R; Di Tommaso M; Berghella V
    BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):414-421. PubMed ID: 27921380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Olivier F; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1312-8. PubMed ID: 12798542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
    Rozenberg P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Hong J; Atkinson J; Roddy Mitchell A; Tong S; Walker SP; Middleton A; Lindquist A; Hastie R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 May; 6(5):e2313162. PubMed ID: 37171818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Active compared with expectant delivery management in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review.
    Witkop CT; Neale D; Wilson LM; Bass EB; Nicholson WK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 113(1):206-217. PubMed ID: 19104376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment of suspected fetal macrosomia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Herbst MA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1035-9. PubMed ID: 16157107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia.
    Combs CA; Singh NB; Khoury JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 81(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 8459954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Full-term induction of labor vs expectant management and cesarean delivery in women with obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Krogh LQ; Glavind J; Henriksen TB; Thornton J; Fuglsang J; Boie S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 May; 5(5):100909. PubMed ID: 36842468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Delivery management for the prevention of shoulder dystocia in case of identified risk factors].
    Schmitz T
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Dec; 44(10):1261-71. PubMed ID: 26530180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Labor induction with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal macrosomia.
    Leaphart WL; Meyer MC; Capeless EL
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1997; 6(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9086425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Delke I; Gaudier FL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 94(5 Pt 2):878-83. PubMed ID: 10546777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: a randomized study.
    Gonen O; Rosen DJ; Dolfin Z; Tepper R; Markov S; Fejgin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 89(6):913-7. PubMed ID: 9170464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prophylactic amnioinfusion for intrapartum oligohydramnios: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Pitt C; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Gaudier F
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 96(5 Pt 2):861-6. PubMed ID: 11094242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Wears RL; Delke I; Gaudier FL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):633-42. PubMed ID: 9083326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial.
    Boulvain M; Senat MV; Perrotin F; Winer N; Beucher G; Subtil D; Bretelle F; Azria E; Hejaiej D; Vendittelli F; Capelle M; Langer B; Matis R; Connan L; Gillard P; Kirkpatrick C; Ceysens G; Faron G; Irion O; Rozenberg P;
    Lancet; 2015 Jun; 385(9987):2600-5. PubMed ID: 25863654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the neonatal safety of indomethacin tocolysis: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Loe SM; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):173-9. PubMed ID: 15994634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia.
    Irion O; Boulvain M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000938. PubMed ID: 10796221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Timing of induction of labor in suspected macrosomia: retrospective cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Badr DA; Carlin A; Kadji C; Kang X; Cannie MM; Jani JC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of suspected fetal macrosomia.
    Zamorski MA; Biggs WS
    Am Fam Physician; 2001 Jan; 63(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 11201695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.