121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12424672)
1. [Sample size determination in reference-controlled diagnostic trials].
Krummenauer F; Kauczor HU
Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1438-44. PubMed ID: 12424672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modified exact sample size for a binomial proportion with special emphasis on diagnostic test parameter estimation.
Fosgate GT
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2857-66. PubMed ID: 16134167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal sample size determinations from an industry perspective based on the expected value of information.
Willan AR
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 19029207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The comparison of clinical imaging devices with respect to parallel readings in both devices.
Krummenauer F
Eur J Med Res; 2006 Mar; 11(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 16751112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simple nomograms to calculate sample size in diagnostic studies.
Carley S; Dosman S; Jones SR; Harrison M
Emerg Med J; 2005 Mar; 22(3):180-1. PubMed ID: 15735264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive design and estimation in randomized clinical trials with correlated observations.
Yin G; Shen Y
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 16011682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simple method for calculating power based on a prior trial.
Borm GF; Bloem BR; Munneke M; Teerenstra S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):992-7. PubMed ID: 20573484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla preoperative MRI of the wrist in patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain.
Anderson ML; Skinner JA; Felmlee JP; Berger RA; Amrami KK
J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 33(7):1153-9. PubMed ID: 18762112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies.
Flahault A; Cadilhac M; Thomas G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):859-62. PubMed ID: 16018921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Basic statistics for clinicians: 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals.
Guyatt G; Jaeschke R; Heddle N; Cook D; Shannon H; Walter S
CMAJ; 1995 Jan; 152(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 7820798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic kits in parasitology: which controls?].
Rossi P
Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):145-9. PubMed ID: 15305705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of calculation methods for diagnostic trials under different sample size].
Wang Y; Hu B; Chen T; Li W
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 31(12):1403-5. PubMed ID: 21223674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
Doyon F; Hill C
J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials.
Borm GF; Fransen J; Lemmens WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1234-8. PubMed ID: 17998077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new approach to sample size calculation for reference interval studies.
Jennen-Steinmetz C; Wellek S
Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(20):3199-212. PubMed ID: 16189809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the adaptive performance of flexible sample size designs with treatment difference in an interval.
Liu GF; Zhu GR; Cui L
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):584-96. PubMed ID: 17634972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation in flexible two stage designs.
Brannath W; König F; Bauer P
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3366-81. PubMed ID: 16220489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The application of the GSK method to the determination of minimum sample sizes.
Rochon J
Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):193-205. PubMed ID: 2655729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity of routine 1.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy as gold standard in fresh traumatic chondral lesions of the knee in young adults.
Kuikka PI; Kiuru MJ; Niva MH; Kröger H; Pihlajamäki HK
Arthroscopy; 2006 Oct; 22(10):1033-9. PubMed ID: 17027399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
