146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12425841)
21. [Clinical evaluation of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments in management of curved root canals].
Xu Q; Fan B; Fan MW; Bian Z
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(2):136-8. PubMed ID: 15061889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
Thompson SA; Dummer PM
J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):742-7. PubMed ID: 9487850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
Gergi R; Sabbagh C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
Thompson SA; Dummer PM
J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9641148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals.
Veltri M; Mollo A; Mantovani L; Pini P; Balleri P; Grandini S
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):610-6. PubMed ID: 16104974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments.
Carvalho LA; Bonetti I; Borges MA
J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):807-10. PubMed ID: 10726526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of Mtwo versus coated and uncoated EasyShape instruments in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Hiller C; Huda M; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):447-57. PubMed ID: 21276014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability.
Williamson AE; Sandor AJ; Justman BC
J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 19084136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals.
Calberson FL; Deroose CA; Hommez GM; De Moor RJ
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):613-23. PubMed ID: 15317565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of the shaping effects of 5 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Ciftçioğlu E; Ozkarsli SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e86-93. PubMed ID: 20416526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
