193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12425989)
21. Prediction of deterioration of velopharyngeal function associated with maxillary advancement using electromyography of levator veli palatini muscle.
Nohara K; Tachimura T; Wada T
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 Mar; 43(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 16526923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does Distraction Lower Risk of VPI Compared to Conventional Maxillary Advancement? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Adolescents with Cleft Palate.
Kinter S; Susarla S; Delaney JC; Chapman K; Kapadia H; Weiss N
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2024 Mar; 61(3):422-432. PubMed ID: 36373608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cephalometric pharyngeal changes after Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Heliövaara A; Ranta R; Hukki J; Haapanen ML
Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Jun; 60(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 12166906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function.
Chua HD; Whitehill TL; Samman N; Cheung LK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 39(7):633-40. PubMed ID: 20413269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Velopharyngeal changes after maxillary advancement in cleft patients with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year cephalometric follow-up.
Ko EW; Figueroa AA; Guyette TW; Polley JW; Law WR
J Craniofac Surg; 1999 Jul; 10(4):312-20; discussion 321-2. PubMed ID: 10686880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgical correction of submucous cleft palate with Furlow palatoplasty.
Chen PK; Wu J; Hung KF; Chen YR; Noordhoff MS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 May; 97(6):1136-46; discussion 1147-9. PubMed ID: 8628796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Maxillary advancement in cleft palate patients. A modification of the Le Fort I osteotomy and preliminary results.
Poole MD; Robinson PP; Nunn ME
J Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Jun; 14(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 3459789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Technical Modifications Specific to the Cleft Le Fort I Osteotomy.
Susarla SM; Ettinger R; Preston K; Hitesh Kapadia ; Egbert MA
J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(5):1459-1463. PubMed ID: 32282690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Velopharyngeal anatomy and maxillary advancement.
Schendel SA; Oeschlaeger M; Wolford LM; Epker BN
J Maxillofac Surg; 1979 May; 7(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 287754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pharyngoplasty in patients with cleft lip and palate after maxillary advancement.
Maegawa J; Sells RK; David DJ
J Craniofac Surg; 1998 Jul; 9(4):330-5; discussion 336-7. PubMed ID: 9780927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Velopharyngeal function assessment in patients with cleft palate: perceptual speech assessment versus nasopharyngoscopy.
Ma L; Shi B; Li Y; Zheng Q
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1229-31. PubMed ID: 23851775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Speech and velopharyngeal function following maxillary advancement in patients with cleft lip and palate.
Okazaki K; Satoh K; Kato M; Iwanami M; Ohokubo F; Kobayashi K
Ann Plast Surg; 1993 Apr; 30(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 8512284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary movement on articulation, resonance, and velopharyngeal function.
Kummer AW; Strife JL; Grau WH; Creaghead NA; Lee L
Cleft Palate J; 1989 Jul; 26(3):193-9; discussion 199-200. PubMed ID: 2758671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improved outcomes in cleft patients with severe maxillary deficiency after Le Fort I internal distraction.
Kumar A; Gabbay JS; Nikjoo R; Heller JB; O'Hara CM; Sisodia M; Garri JI; Wilson LS; Kawamoto HK; Bradley JP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Apr; 117(5):1499-509. PubMed ID: 16641719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Velopharyngeal Insufficiency After Le Fort I Osteotomy in a Patient With Undiagnosed Occult Submucous Cleft Palate.
Dang RR; Padwa BL; Resnick CM
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 May; 28(3):752-754. PubMed ID: 28468158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dimensions of Velopharyngeal Space following Maxillary Advancement with Le Fort I Osteotomy Compared to Zisser Segmental Osteotomy: A Cephalometric Study.
Karabekmez FE; Kleinheinz J; Jung S
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():389605. PubMed ID: 26273615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Velopharyngeal impairment in the orthodontic population.
Dalston RM
Semin Orthod; 1996 Sep; 2(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 9161292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Velopharyngeal incompetence in patients with cleft palate, flexible video pharyngoscopy and perceptual speech assessment: a correlational pilot study.
Rajan S; Kurien M; Gupta AK; Mathews SS; Albert RR; Tychicus D
J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Nov; 128(11):986-90. PubMed ID: 25335572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Alterations in velopharyngeal function after maxillary advancement in cleft palate patients.
Watzke I; Turvey TA; Warren DW; Dalston R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1990 Jul; 48(7):685-9. PubMed ID: 2358944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Morphological evaluation of changes in velopharyngeal function following maxillary distraction in patients with repaired cleft palate during mixed dentition.
Satoh K; Nagata J; Shomura K; Wada T; Tachimura T; Fukuda J; Shiba R
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Jul; 41(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 15222793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
